PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRVBX vs. PRPFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRVBX vs. PRPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio (PRVBX) and Permanent Portfolio Class I (PRPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRVBX achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly lower than PRPFX's 2.08% return. Over the past 10 years, PRVBX has underperformed PRPFX with an annualized return of 4.22%, while PRPFX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.97% annualized return.


PRVBX

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.02%
6M
0.54%
YTD
1.22%
1Y
3.28%
3Y*
5.31%
5Y*
2.53%
10Y*
4.22%
ALL TIME*
3.67%

PRPFX

1D
0.71%
1M
-0.17%
6M
-2.57%
YTD
2.08%
1Y
15.83%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
9.97%
ALL TIME*
7.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PRVBX vs. PRPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRVBX
Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio
1.22%5.66%5.78%6.91%-5.91%2.93%9.88%9.29%2.01%0.69%
PRPFX
Permanent Portfolio Class I
2.08%28.78%19.36%11.96%-5.48%10.87%18.80%19.20%-7.02%11.42%

Correlation

The correlation between PRVBX and PRPFX is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1992

0.19

The correlation between PRVBX and PRPFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRVBX vs. PRPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRVBX
PRVBX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PRVBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRVBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRVBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PRVBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRVBX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

PRPFX
PRPFX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PRPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PRPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRVBX vs. PRPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio (PRVBX) and Permanent Portfolio Class I (PRPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRVBXPRPFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.23

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

1.60

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.97

3.56

+5.40

PRVBX vs. PRPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRVBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the PRPFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRVBX and PRPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRVBX vs. PRPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRVBX drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, smaller than the maximum PRPFX drawdown of -27.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRVBX and PRPFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRVBXPRPFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.91%

-27.16%

+10.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.51%

-9.74%

+8.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.51%

-9.74%

+8.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.22%

-15.49%

+7.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.91%

-20.84%

+3.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-8.67%

+8.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.72%

-3.54%

+2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

4.35%

-3.95%

Volatility

PRVBX vs. PRPFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio (PRVBX) is 0.48%, while Permanent Portfolio Class I (PRPFX) has a volatility of 2.42%. This indicates that PRVBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRVBXPRPFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.48%

2.42%

-1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.48%

10.97%

-9.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84%

13.09%

-11.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.37%

11.12%

-8.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.35%

10.68%

-6.33%

PRVBX vs. PRPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRVBX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than PRPFX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRVBX vs. PRPFX - Dividend Comparison

PRVBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, more than PRPFX's 3.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRPFX
Permanent Portfolio Class I
3.20%3.27%1.86%1.39%1.58%2.05%5.38%4.69%6.90%2.14%0.95%7.06%
PRVBX
Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio
4.13%4.18%3.61%3.16%1.83%0.85%4.73%2.51%1.71%3.30%3.27%5.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRVBX and PRPFX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRPFX has higher volatility (2.42%) compared to PRVBX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRVBX dropped -16.91% vs PRPFX's -27.16%.

PRVBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRVBX and PRPFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer