PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OAIM vs. VEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OAIM vs. VEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneAscent International Equity ETF (OAIM) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OAIM achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly lower than VEU's 13.33% return.


OAIM

1D
0.78%
1M
-0.57%
6M
6.57%
YTD
12.08%
1Y
23.68%
3Y*
15.89%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.36%

VEU

1D
-0.22%
1M
-0.16%
6M
7.25%
YTD
13.33%
1Y
28.40%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
9.66%
ALL TIME*
5.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.28M$1.10M$1.12M
$230.24M$229.52M$221.55M

OAIM vs. VEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
OAIM
OneAscent International Equity ETF
12.08%30.12%8.18%16.96%7.50%
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF
13.33%32.35%5.56%15.84%5.19%

Correlation

The correlation between OAIM and VEU is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022

0.91

The correlation between OAIM and VEU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

OAIM vs. VEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OAIM
VEU

Financial Services

24.8%
23.1%

Technology

19.5%
23.2%

Industrials

16.4%
14.7%

Energy

8.3%
4.3%

Basic Materials

7.7%
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
7.6%

Real Estate

4.6%
1.8%

Communication Services

4.3%
4.2%

Utilities

3.3%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
4.9%

Healthcare

1.1%
6.8%

Financial Services

OAIM
24.8%
VEU
23.1%

Technology

OAIM
19.5%
VEU
23.2%

Industrials

OAIM
16.4%
VEU
14.7%

Energy

OAIM
8.3%
VEU
4.3%

Basic Materials

OAIM
7.7%
VEU
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

OAIM
7.7%
VEU
7.6%

Real Estate

OAIM
4.6%
VEU
1.8%

Communication Services

OAIM
4.3%
VEU
4.2%

Utilities

OAIM
3.3%
VEU
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

OAIM
2.2%
VEU
4.9%

Healthcare

OAIM
1.1%
VEU
6.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OAIM vs. VEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OAIM
OAIM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OAIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OAIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
OAIM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
OAIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
OAIM Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

VEU
VEU Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEU Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEU Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OAIM vs. VEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent International Equity ETF (OAIM) and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OAIMVEUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.30

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

2.46

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.97

9.00

-2.03

OAIM vs. VEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OAIM Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the VEU Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OAIM and VEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OAIM vs. VEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OAIM drawdown since its inception was -14.69%, smaller than the maximum VEU drawdown of -61.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAIM and VEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OAIMVEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.69%

-61.52%

+46.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.88%

-11.43%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.20%

-13.69%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.85%

-2.79%

-2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.84%

-13.05%

+10.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

3.12%

+0.19%

Volatility

OAIM vs. VEU - Volatility Comparison

OneAscent International Equity ETF (OAIM) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) at 5.31%. This indicates that OAIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OAIMVEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.38%

5.31%

+2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.44%

15.10%

+1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.22%

16.96%

+1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

16.37%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

17.08%

+0.28%

OAIM vs. VEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

OAIM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VEU's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

OAIM vs. VEU - Dividend Comparison

OAIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than VEU's 2.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OAIM
OneAscent International Equity ETF
0.88%0.98%2.40%1.94%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF
2.56%3.09%3.24%3.32%3.12%3.08%2.00%3.10%3.27%2.66%2.96%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


OAIM and VEU have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OAIM has higher volatility (7.38%) compared to VEU (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OAIM dropped -14.69% vs VEU's -61.52%.

On 3-year performance, VEU leads with 17.58% vs 15.89% for OAIM. On fees, VEU is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VEU has been the lower-risk option at 5.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VEU has performed better with a 17.58% return vs 15.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEU is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OAIM.

VEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 0.88% for OAIM.

They also come from different issuers: Oneascent and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OAIM and 0.04% for VEU.

VEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OAIM and VEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer