PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OAEM vs. EMM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OAEM vs. EMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) and Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OAEM achieves a 32.44% return, which is significantly higher than EMM's 30.43% return.


OAEM

1D
-6.19%
1M
3.23%
YTD
32.44%
6M
36.48%
1Y
54.85%
3Y*
20.22%
5Y*
10Y*

EMM

1D
-5.60%
1M
4.22%
YTD
30.43%
6M
33.87%
1Y
55.00%
3Y*
21.97%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OAEM vs. EMM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
OAEM
OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF
32.44%26.67%0.43%10.11%
EMM
Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
30.43%30.21%2.34%2.99%

Correlation

The correlation between OAEM and EMM is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2023

0.85

The correlation between OAEM and EMM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OAEM vs. EMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OAEM
OAEM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
OAEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OAEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
OAEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
OAEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
OAEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

EMM
EMM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OAEM vs. EMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) and Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OAEMEMMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.42

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

3.75

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.95

15.03

-0.08

OAEM vs. EMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OAEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the EMM Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OAEM and EMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OAEM vs. EMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OAEM drawdown since its inception was -17.05%, smaller than the maximum EMM drawdown of -21.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAEM and EMM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OAEMEMMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.05%

-21.99%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.63%

-14.75%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.05%

-21.99%

+4.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.19%

-5.60%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.85%

-4.67%

+0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

3.67%

+0.01%

Volatility

OAEM vs. EMM - Volatility Comparison

OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF (OAEM) has a higher volatility of 13.79% compared to Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM) at 13.10%. This indicates that OAEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OAEMEMMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.79%

13.10%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.31%

22.46%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.31%

24.51%

+0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.41%

19.83%

+0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.41%

19.83%

+0.58%

OAEM vs. EMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

OAEM has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EMM's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

OAEM vs. EMM - Dividend Comparison

OAEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than EMM's 0.69% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
EMM
Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
0.69%0.90%0.80%0.66%0.00%
OAEM
OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF
0.58%0.77%0.91%1.63%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


OAEM and EMM have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OAEM has higher volatility (13.79%) compared to EMM (13.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OAEM dropped -17.05% vs EMM's -21.99%.

On 3-year performance, EMM leads with 21.97% vs 20.22% for OAEM. On fees, EMM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, EMM has been the lower-risk option at 13.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EMM has performed better with a 21.97% return vs 20.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for OAEM.

EMM has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.58% for OAEM.

They also come from different issuers: Oneascent and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for OAEM and 0.75% for EMM.

EMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OAEM and EMM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer