OACP vs. VPLS
OACP (OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF) and VPLS (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OACP returned 5.06% vs 5.44% for VPLS. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OACP charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for VPLS.
Performance
OACP vs. VPLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OACP achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than VPLS's 0.74% return.
OACP
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 4.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VPLS
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- 5.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OACP vs. VPLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OACP OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.19% | 7.17% | 2.37% | 2.19% |
VPLS Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF | 0.74% | 7.86% | 2.72% | 2.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between OACP and VPLS is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2023 | 0.95 |
The correlation between OACP and VPLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
OACP vs. VPLS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OACP
VPLS
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
OACP
VPLS
Basic Materials
OACP
-
VPLS
-
Communication Services
OACP
-
VPLS
-
Consumer Cyclical
OACP
-
VPLS
-
Consumer Defensive
OACP
-
VPLS
-
Energy
OACP
-
VPLS
Healthcare
OACP
-
VPLS
-
Industrials
OACP
-
VPLS
-
Real Estate
OACP
-
VPLS
Technology
OACP
-
VPLS
Utilities
OACP
-
VPLS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OACP vs. VPLS — Risk / Return Rank
OACP
VPLS
OACP vs. VPLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OACP | VPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.27 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 2.01 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.70 | 6.52 | -0.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OACP | VPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 1.51 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 1.24 | -0.94 |
Drawdowns
OACP vs. VPLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OACP drawdown since its inception was -11.81%, which is greater than VPLS's maximum drawdown of -4.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OACP and VPLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OACP | VPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.81% | -4.17% | -7.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.60% | -2.72% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -1.11% | -0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.59% | -1.01% | -2.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 0.84% | +0.05% |
Volatility
OACP vs. VPLS - Volatility Comparison
OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS) have volatilities of 1.26% and 1.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OACP | VPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.26% | 1.26% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.57% | 2.69% | -0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.54% | 3.65% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.81% | 4.61% | +1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.81% | 4.61% | +1.20% |
OACP vs. VPLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
OACP has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than VPLS's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
OACP vs. VPLS - Dividend Comparison
OACP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, less than VPLS's 4.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OACP OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.37% | 4.46% | 4.51% | 3.87% | 2.34% |
VPLS Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF | 4.76% | 4.78% | 4.52% | 0.18% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, OACP and VPLS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VPLS has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to OACP (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OACP dropped -11.81% vs VPLS's -4.17%.
On 1-year performance, VPLS leads with 5.44% vs 5.06% for OACP. On fees, VPLS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VPLS has performed better with a 5.44% return vs 5.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VPLS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for OACP.
VPLS has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 4.37% for OACP.
They also come from different issuers: Oneascent and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for OACP and 0.20% for VPLS.
VPLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OACP and VPLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer