OACP vs. FSUTX
OACP (OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF) and FSUTX (Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio) are both funds - OACP is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Oneascent, while FSUTX is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, OACP returned 4.68%/yr vs 16.47%/yr for FSUTX. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OACP charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FSUTX.
Performance
OACP vs. FSUTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OACP achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than FSUTX's 3.35% return.
OACP
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- 4.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSUTX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -3.70%
- YTD
- 3.35%
- 6M
- 3.29%
- 1Y
- 13.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.32%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
OACP vs. FSUTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OACP OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.28% | 7.17% | 2.37% | 6.04% | -7.87% |
FSUTX Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio | 3.35% | 16.19% | 28.76% | -1.12% | -0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between OACP and FSUTX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2022 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OACP vs. FSUTX — Risk / Return Rank
OACP
FSUTX
OACP vs. FSUTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) and Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio (FSUTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OACP | FSUTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.15 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 1.52 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.13 | 3.41 | +1.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OACP vs. FSUTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OACP drawdown since its inception was -11.81%, smaller than the maximum FSUTX drawdown of -66.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OACP and FSUTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OACP | FSUTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.81% | -66.73% | +54.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.60% | -9.21% | +6.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.89% | -15.20% | +9.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.25% | -7.63% | +6.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.58% | -11.25% | +7.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 4.11% | -3.19% |
Volatility
OACP vs. FSUTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) is 1.25%, while Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio (FSUTX) has a volatility of 5.96%. This indicates that OACP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSUTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OACP | FSUTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 5.96% | -4.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.64% | 13.09% | -10.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.53% | 16.35% | -12.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.80% | 17.42% | -11.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.80% | 19.40% | -13.60% |
OACP vs. FSUTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OACP has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than FSUTX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
OACP vs. FSUTX - Dividend Comparison
OACP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, less than FSUTX's 5.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSUTX Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio | 5.08% | 6.61% | 6.50% | 3.52% | 4.67% | 2.68% | 4.86% | 2.29% | 8.37% | 5.61% | 2.51% | 4.47% |
OACP OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.37% | 4.46% | 4.51% | 3.87% | 2.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OACP and FSUTX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSUTX has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to OACP (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OACP dropped -11.81% vs FSUTX's -66.73%.
OACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OACP and FSUTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer