PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
O vs. SAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

O vs. SAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Realty Income Corporation (O) and ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, O achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly lower than SAA's 37.82% return. Over the past 10 years, O has underperformed SAA with an annualized return of 4.89%, while SAA has yielded a comparatively higher 12.47% annualized return.


O

1D
1.31%
1M
1.67%
YTD
13.70%
6M
11.57%
1Y
14.88%
3Y*
6.59%
5Y*
3.49%
10Y*
4.89%

SAA

1D
2.03%
1M
10.79%
YTD
37.82%
6M
30.48%
1Y
72.96%
3Y*
18.49%
5Y*
2.36%
10Y*
12.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

O vs. SAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
O
Realty Income Corporation
13.70%12.20%-2.11%-4.55%-7.38%23.95%-11.60%21.27%15.94%3.67%
SAA
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600
37.82%0.29%5.60%21.32%-36.17%51.77%-1.79%42.39%-23.00%23.94%

Correlation

The correlation between O and SAA is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2007

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between O and SAA has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

O vs. SAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

O
O Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
O Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
O Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
O Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
O Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
O Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SAA
SAA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAA Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

O vs. SAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Realty Income Corporation (O) and ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OSAADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.29

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

3.61

-2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.12

11.75

-8.63

O vs. SAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current O Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the SAA Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of O and SAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

O vs. SAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum O drawdown since its inception was -48.45%, smaller than the maximum SAA drawdown of -87.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for O and SAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OSAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.45%

-87.39%

+38.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.10%

-18.21%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.49%

-50.84%

+24.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.48%

-55.37%

+20.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.28%

-74.54%

+26.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.94%

0.00%

-5.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-27.38%

+18.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.58%

5.60%

-1.02%

Volatility

O vs. SAA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Realty Income Corporation (O) is 5.29%, while ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA) has a volatility of 9.77%. This indicates that O experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OSAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

9.77%

-4.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.98%

24.21%

-12.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.21%

36.26%

-20.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

43.58%

-24.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.64%

46.15%

-20.51%

Dividends

O vs. SAA - Dividend Comparison

O's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than SAA's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
O
Realty Income Corporation
5.16%6.19%5.37%5.33%4.68%3.87%4.51%3.69%4.19%4.45%4.18%4.41%
SAA
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600
0.73%1.05%1.36%0.88%0.46%0.00%0.03%0.35%0.27%0.00%0.14%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


O and SAA have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAA has higher volatility (9.77%) compared to O (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, O dropped -48.45% vs SAA's -87.39%.

SAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for O and SAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer