PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NZAC vs. XESG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NZAC vs. XESG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF (XESG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NZAC is traded in USD, while XESG.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XESG.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NZAC achieves a 6.77% return, which is significantly lower than XESG.TO's 8.30% return.


NZAC

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.64%
YTD
6.77%
6M
7.70%
1Y
22.02%
3Y*
17.54%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*
12.28%

XESG.TO

1D
0.62%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
8.30%
6M
6.45%
1Y
25.69%
3Y*
19.26%
5Y*
9.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NZAC vs. XESG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NZAC
SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
6.77%20.55%16.67%23.22%-19.77%18.35%17.21%12.15%
XESG.TO
iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF
8.30%32.39%10.84%12.99%-13.14%23.15%3.60%14.68%

Correlation

The correlation between NZAC and XESG.TO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019

0.55

The correlation between NZAC and XESG.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NZAC vs. XESG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NZAC
NZAC Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
NZAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NZAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
NZAC Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
NZAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
NZAC Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

XESG.TO
XESG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XESG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XESG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XESG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XESG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XESG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NZAC vs. XESG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF (XESG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NZACXESG.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.33

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

2.69

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.62

10.85

-2.23

NZAC vs. XESG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NZAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the XESG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NZAC and XESG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NZAC vs. XESG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NZAC drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, smaller than the maximum XESG.TO drawdown of -44.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NZAC and XESG.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NZACXESG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.72%

-44.41%

+10.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.10%

-9.72%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.19%

-15.36%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.31%

-25.05%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

-1.74%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-7.12%

+1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

2.40%

-0.01%

Volatility

NZAC vs. XESG.TO - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF (XESG.TO) at 4.57%. This indicates that NZAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XESG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NZACXESG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

4.57%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.12%

11.81%

-0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.56%

14.33%

-0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

15.45%

+1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.17%

23.02%

-5.85%

NZAC vs. XESG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NZAC has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XESG.TO's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NZAC vs. XESG.TO - Dividend Comparison

NZAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than XESG.TO's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NZAC
SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
2.08%1.90%1.88%1.65%1.81%1.62%1.59%2.17%2.53%2.20%2.00%2.40%
XESG.TO
iShares ESG Aware MSCI Canada Index ETF
1.99%2.17%2.57%2.89%2.77%2.01%2.30%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NZAC and XESG.TO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NZAC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NZAC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for XESG.TO.

NZAC is categorized as Global Equities, while XESG.TO is Canada Equities. NZAC tracks MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index, while XESG.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for NZAC and 0.16% for XESG.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NZAC and XESG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer