NZAC vs. IBID
NZAC (SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NZAC is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NZAC returned 20.66% vs 3.92% for IBID. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NZAC charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.
Performance
NZAC vs. IBID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NZAC achieves a 6.02% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 1.94% return.
NZAC
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- 6.02%
- 6M
- 5.37%
- 1Y
- 20.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.81%
- 5Y*
- 9.25%
- 10Y*
- 12.17%
IBID
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NZAC vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 6.02% | 20.55% | 16.67% | 7.48% |
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 1.94% | 5.66% | 4.71% | 2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between NZAC and IBID is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | 0.03 |
The correlation between NZAC and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NZAC vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank
NZAC
IBID
NZAC vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NZAC | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.72 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 7.20 | -5.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | 29.14 | -20.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NZAC vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NZAC drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NZAC and IBID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NZAC | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.72% | -1.28% | -32.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.10% | -0.55% | -9.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.38% | -0.55% | -2.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.31% | -0.22% | -5.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 0.13% | +2.27% |
Volatility
NZAC vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that NZAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NZAC | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 0.35% | +5.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.34% | 0.86% | +10.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.73% | 1.23% | +12.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 2.24% | +14.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 2.24% | +14.89% |
NZAC vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison
NZAC has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NZAC vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison
NZAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than IBID's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 3.68% | 4.43% | 4.24% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 2.09% | 1.90% | 1.88% | 1.65% | 1.81% | 1.62% | 1.59% | 2.17% | 2.53% | 2.20% | 2.00% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NZAC and IBID have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NZAC has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NZAC dropped -33.72% vs IBID's -1.28%.
On 1-year performance, NZAC leads with 20.66% vs 3.92% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NZAC has performed better with a 20.66% return vs 3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for NZAC.
IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 2.09% for NZAC.
NZAC is categorized as Global Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. NZAC tracks MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index, while IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for NZAC and 0.10% for IBID.
IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NZAC and IBID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer