NZAC vs. DRLL
NZAC (SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF) and DRLL (Strive U.S. Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NZAC is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index, while DRLL is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NZAC returned 18.59%/yr vs 11.02%/yr for DRLL. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NZAC charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DRLL.
Performance
NZAC vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NZAC achieves a 10.47% return, which is significantly lower than DRLL's 29.95% return.
NZAC
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.93%
- 6M
- 10.56%
- YTD
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 20.75%
- 3Y*
- 18.59%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.32%
DRLL
- 1D
- -2.68%
- 1M
- 8.84%
- 6M
- 11.16%
- YTD
- 29.95%
- 1Y
- 37.23%
- 3Y*
- 11.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $478.10K | $507.89K | $528.94K | |
| $225.27K | $160.91K | $205.87K |
NZAC vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 10.47% | 20.55% | 16.67% | 23.22% | -6.44% |
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF | 29.95% | 7.74% | 0.02% | -1.84% | 15.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between NZAC and DRLL is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022 | 0.19 |
The correlation between NZAC and DRLL shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NZAC vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank
NZAC
DRLL
NZAC vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NZAC | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.27 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 2.20 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.16 | 5.57 | +2.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NZAC vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NZAC drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, which is greater than DRLL's maximum drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NZAC and DRLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NZAC | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.72% | -23.73% | -9.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.10% | -16.99% | +6.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.19% | -23.73% | +7.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -9.02% | +8.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.28% | -8.14% | +2.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 6.71% | -4.16% |
Volatility
NZAC vs. DRLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) is 4.36%, while Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that NZAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NZAC | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 7.42% | -3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.76% | 18.67% | -6.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.05% | 23.14% | -9.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 23.82% | -6.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 23.82% | -6.73% |
NZAC vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
NZAC has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
NZAC vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison
NZAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than DRLL's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF | 2.34% | 2.99% | 3.00% | 3.01% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 2.01% | 1.90% | 1.88% | 1.65% | 1.81% | 1.62% | 1.59% | 2.17% | 2.53% | 2.20% | 2.00% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NZAC and DRLL have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRLL has higher volatility (7.42%) compared to NZAC (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NZAC dropped -33.72% vs DRLL's -23.73%.
On 3-year performance, NZAC leads with 18.59% vs 11.02% for DRLL. On fees, NZAC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, NZAC has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NZAC has performed better with a 18.59% return vs 11.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NZAC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DRLL.
DRLL has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 2.01% for NZAC.
NZAC is categorized as Global Equities, while DRLL is Energy Equities. NZAC tracks MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index, while DRLL tracks Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for NZAC and 0.41% for DRLL.
DRLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NZAC and DRLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer