PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NYT vs. LLYVK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NYT vs. LLYVK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The New York Times Company (NYT) and Liberty Media Corporation Series C Liberty Live Common Stock (LLYVK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NYT achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly lower than LLYVK's 17.71% return.


NYT

1D
-1.34%
1M
-3.84%
YTD
4.39%
6M
2.76%
1Y
33.85%
3Y*
25.63%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
20.92%

LLYVK

1D
-0.58%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
17.71%
6M
15.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NYT vs. LLYVK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NYT and LLYVK is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025

0.27

Fundamentals

EPS

NYT:

$2.33

LLYVK:

-$0.19

PS Ratio

NYT:

4.08

LLYVK:

3.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

NYT:

$2.90B

LLYVK:

$2.18B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NYT:

$1.49B

LLYVK:

$825.52M

EBITDA (TTM)

NYT:

$573.11M

LLYVK:

$551.52M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NYT vs. LLYVK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NYT
NYT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NYT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
NYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NYT Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

LLYVK

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NYT vs. LLYVK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The New York Times Company (NYT) and Liberty Media Corporation Series C Liberty Live Common Stock (LLYVK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NYTLLYVKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.26

NYT vs. LLYVK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NYT vs. LLYVK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NYT drawdown since its inception was -92.09%, which is greater than LLYVK's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYT and LLYVK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NYTLLYVKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.09%

-11.77%

-80.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.05%

-3.97%

-12.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.17%

-3.36%

-28.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.45%

Volatility

NYT vs. LLYVK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NYTLLYVKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.83%

33.02%

-4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.42%

33.02%

-3.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.75%

33.02%

-2.27%

Dividends

NYT vs. LLYVK - Dividend Comparison

NYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, while LLYVK has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LLYVK
Liberty Media Corporation Series C Liberty Live Common Stock
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NYT
The New York Times Company
1.07%0.97%0.96%0.86%1.05%0.56%0.44%0.59%0.72%0.86%1.20%1.19%

Financials

NYT vs. LLYVK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The New York Times Company and Liberty Media Corporation Series C Liberty Live Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
712.24M
711.00M
(NYT) Total Revenue
(LLYVK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NYT vs. LLYVK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The New York Times Company and Liberty Media Corporation Series C Liberty Live Common Stock over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
49.0%
41.9%
Portfolio components
NYT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The New York Times Company reported a gross profit of 349.30M and revenue of 712.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.

LLYVK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liberty Media Corporation Series C Liberty Live Common Stock reported a gross profit of 298.00M and revenue of 711.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.9%.

NYT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The New York Times Company reported an operating income of 90.62M and revenue of 712.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.7%.

LLYVK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liberty Media Corporation Series C Liberty Live Common Stock reported an operating income of 64.00M and revenue of 711.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.

NYT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The New York Times Company reported a net income of 87.92M and revenue of 712.24M, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.

LLYVK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liberty Media Corporation Series C Liberty Live Common Stock reported a net income of 57.00M and revenue of 711.00M, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NYT and LLYVK have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NYT and LLYVK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer