PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NYT vs. DAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NYT vs. DAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The New York Times Company (NYT) and Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NYT achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly lower than DAL's 24.47% return. Over the past 10 years, NYT has outperformed DAL with an annualized return of 20.92%, while DAL has yielded a comparatively lower 10.68% annualized return.


NYT

1D
-1.34%
1M
-3.84%
YTD
4.39%
6M
2.76%
1Y
33.85%
3Y*
25.63%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
20.92%

DAL

1D
2.07%
1M
12.84%
YTD
24.47%
6M
19.87%
1Y
84.21%
3Y*
27.48%
5Y*
14.42%
10Y*
10.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NYT vs. DAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NYT
The New York Times Company
4.39%35.06%7.33%52.60%-32.16%-6.18%61.92%45.26%21.35%40.50%
DAL
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
24.47%16.09%52.00%23.03%-15.92%-2.81%-30.77%20.38%-8.66%16.23%

Correlation

The correlation between NYT and DAL is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2007

0.29

The correlation between NYT and DAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NYT:

$11.80B

DAL:

$56.02B

EPS

NYT:

$2.33

DAL:

$6.85

PE Ratio

NYT:

30.96

DAL:

12.54

PEG Ratio

NYT:

2.07

DAL:

0.08

PS Ratio

NYT:

4.08

DAL:

0.86

PB Ratio

NYT:

5.90

DAL:

2.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

NYT:

$2.90B

DAL:

$65.18B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NYT:

$1.49B

DAL:

$17.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

NYT:

$573.11M

DAL:

$9.66B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NYT vs. DAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NYT
NYT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NYT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
NYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NYT Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

DAL
DAL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
DAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAL Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NYT vs. DAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The New York Times Company (NYT) and Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NYTDALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.33

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

3.70

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.26

11.81

-6.55

NYT vs. DAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NYT Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the DAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NYT and DAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NYT vs. DAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NYT drawdown since its inception was -92.09%, which is greater than DAL's maximum drawdown of -81.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYT and DAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NYTDALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.09%

-81.93%

-10.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.05%

-22.90%

+6.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.67%

-47.92%

+28.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.83%

-47.92%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.93%

-69.18%

+19.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.05%

0.00%

-16.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.17%

-29.09%

-3.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.45%

7.16%

-0.71%

Volatility

NYT vs. DAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The New York Times Company (NYT) is 6.01%, while Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL) has a volatility of 12.24%. This indicates that NYT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NYTDALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

12.24%

-6.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.61%

30.06%

-10.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.83%

41.43%

-12.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.42%

41.00%

-11.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.75%

42.25%

-11.50%

Dividends

NYT vs. DAL - Dividend Comparison

NYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than DAL's 0.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAL
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
0.87%0.97%0.83%0.50%0.00%0.00%1.00%2.57%2.63%1.81%1.37%0.89%
NYT
The New York Times Company
1.07%0.97%0.96%0.86%1.05%0.56%0.44%0.59%0.72%0.86%1.20%1.19%

Financials

NYT vs. DAL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The New York Times Company and Delta Air Lines, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
712.24M
15.85B
(NYT) Total Revenue
(DAL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NYT vs. DAL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The New York Times Company and Delta Air Lines, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
49.0%
28.6%
Portfolio components
NYT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The New York Times Company reported a gross profit of 349.30M and revenue of 712.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.

DAL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Delta Air Lines, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.54B and revenue of 15.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.6%.

NYT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The New York Times Company reported an operating income of 90.62M and revenue of 712.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.7%.

DAL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Delta Air Lines, Inc. reported an operating income of 501.00M and revenue of 15.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

NYT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The New York Times Company reported a net income of 87.92M and revenue of 712.24M, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.

DAL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Delta Air Lines, Inc. reported a net income of -289.00M and revenue of 15.85B, resulting in a net margin of -1.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NYT and DAL have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DAL has higher volatility (12.24%) compared to NYT (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NYT dropped -92.09% vs DAL's -81.93%.

DAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NYT and DAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer