NYSX vs. QLC

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NYSX (Global X NYSE 100 ETF) and QLC (FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NYSX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE 100 Index, while QLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NYSX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QLC.

Performance

NYSX vs. QLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NYSE 100 ETF (NYSX) and FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NYSX

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 11.23%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QLC

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 5.15%
• YTD: 12.12%
• 6M: 12.40%
• 1Y: 33.91%
• 3Y*: 25.73%
• 5Y*: 15.44%
• 10Y*: 14.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NYSX vs. QLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NYSX Global X NYSE 100 ETF	34.86%
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund	17.06%

Correlation

The correlation between NYSX and QLC is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026	0.86

Return for Risk

NYSX vs. QLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLC

QLC Risk / Return Rank: 83
QLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
QLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
QLC Omega Ratio Rank: 82
QLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
QLC Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NYSX vs. QLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NYSE 100 ETF (NYSX) and FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NYSX	QLC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	17.95	0.80	+17.15

Drawdowns

NYSX vs. QLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NYSX drawdown since its inception was -3.46%, smaller than the maximum QLC drawdown of -35.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYSX and QLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	NYSX	QLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.46%	-35.86%	+32.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.84%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.49%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.81%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.37%	-0.09%	-1.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.52%	-4.54%	+4.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.89%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NYSX	QLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.89%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.52%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.44%	12.38%	+9.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.44%	16.82%	+4.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.44%	18.42%	+3.02%

NYSX vs. QLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

NYSX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QLC's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

NYSX vs. QLC - Dividend Comparison

NYSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NYSX Global X NYSE 100 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund	0.87%	0.94%	1.03%	1.26%	1.46%	0.96%	1.40%	1.91%	1.82%	1.29%	1.80%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NYSX and QLC in my portfolio?

NYSX and QLC have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NYSX or QLC?

On fees, NYSX is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NYSX or QLC?

NYSX is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QLC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NYSX or QLC?

QLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.00% for NYSX.

What is the main difference between NYSX and QLC?

NYSX is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. NYSX tracks NYSE 100 Index, while QLC tracks Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for NYSX and 0.25% for QLC.