NYM vs. IEO
NYM (AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF) and IEO (iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NYM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while IEO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Oil Exploration & Production Index. NYM is actively managed, while IEO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. NYM charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IEO.
Performance
NYM vs. IEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NYM achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than IEO's 34.59% return.
NYM
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IEO
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- -3.23%
- YTD
- 34.59%
- 6M
- 26.42%
- 1Y
- 40.11%
- 3Y*
- 16.01%
- 5Y*
- 18.96%
- 10Y*
- 10.42%
NYM vs. IEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NYM AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.43% | 0.41% |
IEO iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 34.59% | -2.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between NYM and IEO is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025 | -0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NYM vs. IEO — Risk / Return Rank
NYM
IEO
NYM vs. IEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF (NYM) and iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (IEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NYM | IEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | 0.17 | +1.46 |
Drawdowns
NYM vs. IEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NYM drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum IEO drawdown of -79.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYM and IEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NYM | IEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -79.17% | +77.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -7.30% | +7.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.42% | -26.27% | +25.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.28% | — |
Volatility
NYM vs. IEO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NYM | IEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06% | 25.15% | -23.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.06% | 30.54% | -28.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.06% | 35.00% | -32.94% |
NYM vs. IEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NYM has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than IEO's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
NYM vs. IEO - Dividend Comparison
NYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than IEO's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEO iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 1.97% | 2.61% | 2.63% | 3.00% | 3.77% | 2.62% | 3.17% | 1.85% | 1.67% | 0.94% | 0.98% | 2.03% |
NYM AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.73% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NYM and IEO have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NYM is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NYM is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IEO.
IEO has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 1.73% for NYM.
NYM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while IEO is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for NYM and 0.42% for IEO.
Find the right allocation for NYM and IEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer