NYM vs. HIDV
NYM (AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF) and HIDV (AB US High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NYM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while HIDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NYM charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for HIDV.
Performance
NYM vs. HIDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NYM achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than HIDV's 10.96% return.
NYM
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIDV
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 22.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NYM vs. HIDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NYM AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.43% | 0.41% |
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF | 10.96% | 2.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between NYM and HIDV is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NYM vs. HIDV — Risk / Return Rank
NYM
HIDV
NYM vs. HIDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF (NYM) and AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NYM | HIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | 1.62 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
NYM vs. HIDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NYM drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum HIDV drawdown of -18.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYM and HIDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NYM | HIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -18.76% | +17.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -0.95% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.42% | -2.05% | +1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.19% | — |
Volatility
NYM vs. HIDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NYM | HIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06% | 11.91% | -9.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.06% | 14.52% | -12.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.06% | 14.52% | -12.46% |
NYM vs. HIDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NYM has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than HIDV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
NYM vs. HIDV - Dividend Comparison
NYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than HIDV's 2.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF | 2.27% | 2.22% | 2.29% | 2.23% |
NYM AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.73% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NYM and HIDV have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NYM is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NYM is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HIDV.
HIDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 1.73% for NYM.
NYM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while HIDV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for NYM and 0.45% for HIDV.
Find the right allocation for NYM and HIDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer