NYF vs. SPMO
NYF (iShares New York Muni Bond ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NYF is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NYF returned 1.76%/yr vs 20.59%/yr for SPMO. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NYF charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
NYF vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NYF achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 26.56% return. Over the past 10 years, NYF has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 1.76%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.59% annualized return.
NYF
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 6.63%
- 3Y*
- 3.28%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- 1.76%
SPMO
- 1D
- 4.80%
- 1M
- 4.24%
- YTD
- 26.56%
- 6M
- 24.30%
- 1Y
- 41.83%
- 3Y*
- 41.24%
- 5Y*
- 23.19%
- 10Y*
- 20.59%
NYF vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NYF iShares New York Muni Bond ETF | 1.58% | 3.64% | 1.13% | 5.76% | -7.75% | 1.34% | 4.18% | 6.49% | 0.66% | 5.02% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 26.56% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between NYF and SPMO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.03 |
Over the past year, NYF and SPMO have become more correlated (0.24) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NYF vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
NYF
SPMO
NYF vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares New York Muni Bond ETF (NYF) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NYF | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.40 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 3.31 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.60 | 12.52 | -3.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NYF vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NYF drawdown since its inception was -13.12%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYF and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NYF | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.12% | -30.95% | +17.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.76% | -12.70% | +9.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.68% | -20.13% | +14.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.71% | -22.74% | +10.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.12% | -30.95% | +17.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -2.91% | +2.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.31% | -4.60% | +2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 3.35% | -2.58% |
Volatility
NYF vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares New York Muni Bond ETF (NYF) is 0.97%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.29%. This indicates that NYF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NYF | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.97% | 10.29% | -9.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.10% | 16.70% | -14.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76% | 19.45% | -16.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 19.65% | -15.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.48% | 20.48% | -16.00% |
NYF vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NYF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NYF vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
NYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, more than SPMO's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NYF iShares New York Muni Bond ETF | 3.09% | 2.99% | 2.77% | 2.36% | 2.04% | 1.85% | 1.98% | 2.19% | 2.48% | 2.46% | 2.43% | 2.60% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NYF and SPMO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to NYF (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NYF dropped -13.12% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.59% vs 1.76% for NYF. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, NYF has been the lower-risk option at 0.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.59% return vs 1.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for NYF.
NYF has the higher dividend yield at 3.09%, compared with 0.67% for SPMO.
NYF is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while SPMO is Momentum. NYF tracks S&P New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for NYF and 0.13% for SPMO.
NYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NYF and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer