NXUS vs. NUMV

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

NXUS (Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF) and NUMV (Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NXUS is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (USD Hedged), while NUMV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NXUS charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for NUMV.

Performance

NXUS vs. NUMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF (NXUS) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXUS achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than NUMV's 11.33% return.

NXUS

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.96%
• YTD: 1.52%
• 6M: 1.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NUMV

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 2.79%
• YTD: 11.33%
• 6M: 9.98%
• 1Y: 23.56%
• 3Y*: 16.37%
• 5Y*: 7.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXUS vs. NUMV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF	1.52%	0.45%
NUMV Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF	11.33%	3.17%

Correlation

The correlation between NXUS and NUMV is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.38

Return for Risk

NXUS vs. NUMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXUS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NUMV

NUMV Risk / Return Rank: 65
NUMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
NUMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
NUMV Omega Ratio Rank: 62
NUMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
NUMV Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXUS vs. NUMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF (NXUS) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NXUS	NUMV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.88	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.74	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.72	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.25	—

Drawdowns

NXUS vs. NUMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXUS drawdown since its inception was -2.81%, smaller than the maximum NUMV drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXUS and NUMV.

Drawdown Indicators

	NXUS	NUMV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.81%	-43.46%	+40.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.71%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.53%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.32%	0.00%	-0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.90%	-6.85%	+5.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.30%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NXUS	NUMV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.51%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.43%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.71%	12.57%	-8.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.71%	17.37%	-13.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.71%	19.73%	-16.02%

NXUS vs. NUMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXUS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than NUMV's 0.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

NXUS vs. NUMV - Dividend Comparison

NXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than NUMV's 1.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NUMV Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF	1.38%	1.53%	1.81%	2.20%	5.78%	6.62%	1.38%	2.40%	4.01%	0.83%
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF	1.65%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NXUS and NUMV in my portfolio?

NXUS and NUMV have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NXUS or NUMV?

On fees, NXUS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NXUS or NUMV?

NXUS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for NUMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NXUS or NUMV?

NXUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 1.38% for NUMV.

What is the main difference between NXUS and NUMV?

NXUS is categorized as Global Bonds, while NUMV is Mid Cap Value Equities. NXUS tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (USD Hedged), while NUMV tracks TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for NXUS and 0.31% for NUMV.