NXUS vs. NUMG
NXUS (Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF) and NUMG (Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NXUS is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (USD Hedged), while NUMG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Mid Cap Growth. Both are passively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NXUS charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for NUMG.
Performance
NXUS vs. NUMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NXUS achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly higher than NUMG's -4.51% return.
NXUS
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUMG
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- -4.51%
- 6M
- -6.33%
- 1Y
- -4.49%
- 3Y*
- 6.13%
- 5Y*
- -0.91%
- 10Y*
- —
NXUS vs. NUMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF | 1.52% | 0.45% |
NUMG Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -4.51% | -2.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between NXUS and NUMG is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NXUS vs. NUMG — Risk / Return Rank
NXUS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NUMG
NXUS vs. NUMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF (NXUS) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NXUS | NUMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.98 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.23 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.57 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NXUS vs. NUMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NXUS drawdown since its inception was -2.81%, smaller than the maximum NUMG drawdown of -38.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXUS and NUMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NXUS | NUMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.81% | -38.85% | +36.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -19.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -13.08% | +12.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.90% | -11.37% | +10.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.84% | — |
Volatility
NXUS vs. NUMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NXUS | NUMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.08% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.71% | 18.62% | -14.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.71% | 22.93% | -19.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.71% | 21.85% | -18.14% |
NXUS vs. NUMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NXUS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than NUMG's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
NXUS vs. NUMG - Dividend Comparison
NXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than NUMG's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUMG Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.18% | 0.18% | 12.76% | 3.82% | 0.27% | 5.14% | 0.56% |
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF | 1.65% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NXUS and NUMG have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NXUS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NXUS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NUMG.
NXUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.01% for NUMG.
NXUS is categorized as Global Bonds, while NUMG is Mid Cap Growth Equities. NXUS tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (USD Hedged), while NUMG tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Mid Cap Growth. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for NXUS and 0.30% for NUMG.
Find the right allocation for NXUS and NUMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer