PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NXUS vs. NULV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NXUS vs. NULV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF (NXUS) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXUS achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than NULV's 12.19% return.


NXUS

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.45%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NULV

1D
-1.48%
1M
1.42%
YTD
12.19%
6M
12.09%
1Y
25.26%
3Y*
17.16%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXUS vs. NULV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NXUS and NULV is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NXUS vs. NULV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXUS

NULV
NULV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
NULV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NULV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXUS vs. NULV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF (NXUS) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NXUS vs. NULV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NXUSNULVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.60

-0.17

Drawdowns

NXUS vs. NULV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXUS drawdown since its inception was -2.81%, smaller than the maximum NULV drawdown of -36.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXUS and NULV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NXUSNULVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.81%

-36.99%

+34.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-1.48%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.91%

-4.97%

+4.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

Volatility

NXUS vs. NULV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NXUSNULVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.73%

10.79%

-7.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.73%

14.34%

-10.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.73%

17.02%

-13.29%

NXUS vs. NULV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXUS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than NULV's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NXUS vs. NULV - Dividend Comparison

NXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than NULV's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
1.46%1.64%2.09%2.55%2.12%4.52%1.42%1.47%3.73%1.22%
NXUS
Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF
1.67%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NXUS and NULV have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NXUS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NXUS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for NULV.

NXUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.46% for NULV.

NXUS is categorized as Global Bonds, while NULV is Large Cap Value Equities. NXUS tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (USD Hedged), while NULV tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Value. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for NXUS and 0.26% for NULV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NXUS and NULV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer