NXUS vs. NULG
NXUS (Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF) and NULG (Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NXUS is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (USD Hedged), while NULG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Growth. Both are passively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NXUS charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for NULG.
Performance
NXUS vs. NULG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NXUS achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than NULG's 15.04% return.
NXUS
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NULG
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 15.04%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- 1Y
- 22.09%
- 3Y*
- 22.82%
- 5Y*
- 13.35%
- 10Y*
- —
NXUS vs. NULG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF | 1.52% | 0.45% |
NULG Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF | 15.04% | -1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between NXUS and NULG is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NXUS vs. NULG — Risk / Return Rank
NXUS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NULG
NXUS vs. NULG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF (NXUS) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NXUS | NULG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.53 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.13 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NXUS vs. NULG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NXUS drawdown since its inception was -2.81%, smaller than the maximum NULG drawdown of -36.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXUS and NULG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NXUS | NULG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.81% | -36.17% | +33.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -2.93% | +2.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.90% | -6.81% | +5.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.31% | — |
Volatility
NXUS vs. NULG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NXUS | NULG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.71% | 18.22% | -14.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.71% | 21.74% | -18.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.71% | 21.46% | -17.75% |
NXUS vs. NULG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NXUS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than NULG's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NXUS vs. NULG - Dividend Comparison
NXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than NULG's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NULG Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.10% | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.43% | 0.40% | 5.08% | 2.68% | 1.10% | 3.73% | 0.61% |
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF | 1.65% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NXUS and NULG have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NXUS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NXUS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for NULG.
NXUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.10% for NULG.
NXUS is categorized as Global Bonds, while NULG is Large Cap Growth Equities. NXUS tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (USD Hedged), while NULG tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Growth. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for NXUS and 0.25% for NULG.
Find the right allocation for NXUS and NULG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer