NXUS vs. NUBD
NXUS (Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF) and NUBD (Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NXUS is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (USD Hedged), while NUBD is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg MSCI U.S. Aggregate ESG Select Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NXUS charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for NUBD.
Performance
NXUS vs. NUBD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NXUS achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly higher than NUBD's -0.02% return.
NXUS
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUBD
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 4.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.66%
- 5Y*
- -0.11%
- 10Y*
- —
NXUS vs. NUBD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.48% | 0.61% |
NUBD Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | -0.02% | 1.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between NXUS and NUBD is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NXUS vs. NUBD — Risk / Return Rank
NXUS
NUBD
NXUS vs. NUBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF (NXUS) and Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NXUS | NUBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.28 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
NXUS vs. NUBD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NXUS drawdown since its inception was -2.81%, smaller than the maximum NUBD drawdown of -19.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXUS and NUBD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NXUS | NUBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.81% | -19.45% | +16.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -4.14% | +2.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.91% | -6.05% | +5.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.94% | — |
Volatility
NXUS vs. NUBD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NXUS | NUBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73% | 3.77% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.73% | 5.99% | -2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.73% | 5.12% | -1.39% |
NXUS vs. NUBD - Expense Ratio Comparison
NXUS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than NUBD's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NXUS vs. NUBD - Dividend Comparison
NXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than NUBD's 4.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUBD Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.00% | 3.90% | 3.51% | 2.99% | 2.83% | 2.05% | 2.21% | 2.66% | 3.08% | 0.58% |
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF | 1.67% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NXUS and NUBD have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NXUS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NXUS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for NUBD.
NUBD has the higher dividend yield at 4.00%, compared with 1.67% for NXUS.
NXUS is categorized as Global Bonds, while NUBD is Intermediate Core Bond. NXUS tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (USD Hedged), while NUBD tracks Bloomberg MSCI U.S. Aggregate ESG Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for NXUS and 0.15% for NUBD.
Find the right allocation for NXUS and NUBD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer