NXUS vs. FOPC

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

NXUS (Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF) and FOPC (Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NXUS is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (USD Hedged), while FOPC is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Frontier. NXUS is passively managed, while FOPC is actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NXUS charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for FOPC.

Performance

NXUS vs. FOPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF (NXUS) and Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF (FOPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NXUS having a 0.54% return and FOPC slightly lower at 0.52%.

NXUS

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -0.66%
• 6M: 0.08%
• YTD: 0.54%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FOPC

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -0.37%
• 6M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.52%
• 1Y: 3.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXUS vs. FOPC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF	0.54%	0.45%
FOPC Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF	0.52%	0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between NXUS and FOPC is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.77

Return for Risk

NXUS vs. FOPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXUS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FOPC

FOPC Risk / Return Rank: 44
FOPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
FOPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
FOPC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
FOPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
FOPC Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXUS vs. FOPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF (NXUS) and Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF (FOPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NXUS	FOPC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.33	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.95	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.24	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.77	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.50	—

Drawdowns

NXUS vs. FOPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXUS drawdown since its inception was -2.81%, which is greater than FOPC's maximum drawdown of -2.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXUS and FOPC.

Drawdown Indicators

	NXUS	FOPC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.81%	-2.18%	-0.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	-0.92%	-0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.90%	-0.45%	-0.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.70%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NXUS	FOPC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.94%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.35%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.70%	2.91%	+0.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.70%	3.12%	+0.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.70%	3.12%	+0.58%

NXUS vs. FOPC - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXUS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FOPC's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

NXUS vs. FOPC - Dividend Comparison

NXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than FOPC's 4.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FOPC Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF	4.22%	4.42%	0.06%
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF	1.95%	0.39%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NXUS and FOPC in my portfolio?

NXUS and FOPC have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NXUS or FOPC?

On fees, NXUS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NXUS or FOPC?

NXUS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for FOPC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NXUS or FOPC?

FOPC has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 1.95% for NXUS.

What is the main difference between NXUS and FOPC?

NXUS is categorized as Global Bonds, while FOPC is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Frontier. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for NXUS and 0.87% for FOPC.