NXTG vs. MAGS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

NXTG (First Trust IndXX NextG ETF) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. NXTG is passively managed, while MAGS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, NXTG returned 28.09%/yr vs 28.94%/yr for MAGS. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NXTG charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MAGS.

Performance

NXTG vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NXTG

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: -2.13%
• 6M: 28.42%
• YTD: 35.27%
• 1Y: 53.55%
• 3Y*: 28.09%
• 5Y*: 15.88%
• 10Y*: 15.78%
• ALL TIME*: 12.21%

MAGS

• 1D: 3.19%
• 1M: 1.32%
• 6M: -0.29%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 1Y: 17.98%
• 3Y*: 28.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 35.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	$254.73M	$303.60M	$278.63M
NXTG First Trust IndXX NextG ETF	$1.58M	$1.75M	$2.16M

NXTG vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NXTG First Trust IndXX NextG ETF	35.27%	28.46%	12.85%	13.61%
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	0.00%	22.99%	63.97%	35.74%

Correlation

The correlation between NXTG and MAGS is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023	0.58

The correlation between NXTG and MAGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

NXTG vs. MAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NXTG	MAGS
Technology	64.5%	13.0%
Communication Services	22.2%	6.5%
Industrials	6.5%	-
Real Estate	6.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.5%	6.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

NXTG vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NXTG

NXTG Risk / Return Rank: 87
NXTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
NXTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
NXTG Omega Ratio Rank: 89
NXTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
NXTG Martin Ratio Rank: 82

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 27
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 26
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NXTG vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NXTG	MAGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	0.64	+1.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	1.01	+2.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.12	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	0.77	+2.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.87	2.26	+8.61

NXTG vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXTG Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the MAGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXTG and MAGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NXTG vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXTG drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTG and MAGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	NXTG	MAGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.61%	-29.91%	-3.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.41%	-18.62%	+3.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.75%	-29.91%	+12.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.19%	-7.02%	-6.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.93%	-4.86%	-3.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.87%	6.31%	-1.44%

Volatility

NXTG vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) is 6.84%, while Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) has a volatility of 8.02%. This indicates that NXTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NXTG	MAGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.84%	8.02%	-1.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.89%	17.37%	+2.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.42%	22.30%	+0.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.80%	26.09%	-7.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.12%	26.09%	-6.97%

NXTG vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXTG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

NXTG vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

NXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than MAGS's 1.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.48%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NXTG First Trust IndXX NextG ETF	1.27%	1.56%	1.51%	2.15%	2.04%	1.97%	1.04%	0.77%	1.27%	1.65%	1.23%	1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NXTG and MAGS in my portfolio?

NXTG and MAGS have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NXTG or MAGS?

MAGS has higher volatility (8.02%) compared to NXTG (6.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXTG dropped -33.61% vs MAGS's -29.91%.

Which ETF is better, NXTG or MAGS?

On 3-year performance, MAGS leads with 28.94% vs 28.09% for NXTG. On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, NXTG has been the lower-risk option at 6.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NXTG or MAGS?

Over the 3-year period, MAGS has performed better with a 28.94% return vs 28.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NXTG or MAGS?

MAGS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for NXTG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NXTG or MAGS?

MAGS has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 1.27% for NXTG.

What is the main difference between NXTG and MAGS?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for NXTG and 0.30% for MAGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NXTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.