PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NXTG vs. AIVC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NXTG vs. AIVC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) and Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXTG achieves a 54.54% return, which is significantly lower than AIVC's 79.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NXTG having a 17.94% annualized return and AIVC not far behind at 17.12%.


NXTG

1D
-0.82%
1M
22.84%
YTD
54.54%
6M
55.39%
1Y
82.82%
3Y*
35.56%
5Y*
19.17%
10Y*
17.94%

AIVC

1D
-1.33%
1M
30.74%
YTD
79.45%
6M
79.35%
1Y
151.70%
3Y*
51.42%
5Y*
20.46%
10Y*
17.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXTG vs. AIVC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NXTG
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF
54.54%28.46%12.85%28.74%-24.70%21.81%27.58%29.58%-17.25%28.02%
AIVC
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
79.45%39.94%18.22%39.28%-38.91%-7.23%41.45%27.78%-18.62%35.42%

Correlation

The correlation between NXTG and AIVC is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2016

0.69

The correlation between NXTG and AIVC shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.86 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NXTG vs. AIVC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NXTG
AIVC

Technology

66.1%
91.2%

Communication Services

21.7%
4.6%

Real Estate

7.5%

-

Industrials

4.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.4%
4.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.8%

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

NXTG
66.1%
AIVC
91.2%

Communication Services

NXTG
21.7%
AIVC
4.6%

Real Estate

NXTG
7.5%
AIVC

-

Industrials

NXTG
4.3%
AIVC

-

Consumer Cyclical

NXTG
0.4%
AIVC
4.2%

Basic Materials

NXTG

-

AIVC

-

Consumer Defensive

NXTG

-

AIVC

-

Energy

NXTG

-

AIVC

-

Financial Services

NXTG

-

AIVC
0.8%

Healthcare

NXTG

-

AIVC

-

Utilities

NXTG

-

AIVC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NXTG vs. AIVC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXTG
NXTG Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
NXTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTG Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

AIVC
AIVC Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AIVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVC Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVC Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXTG vs. AIVC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) and Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NXTGAIVCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.69

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.10

10.82

-2.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

31.73

36.63

-4.90

NXTG vs. AIVC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXTG Sharpe Ratio is 4.52, which is comparable to the AIVC Sharpe Ratio of 5.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXTG and AIVC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NXTGAIVCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.52

5.14

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.08

0.68

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

0.64

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.64

+0.05

Drawdowns

NXTG vs. AIVC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXTG drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, smaller than the maximum AIVC drawdown of -56.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTG and AIVC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NXTGAIVCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.61%

-56.11%

+22.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.28%

-14.11%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.75%

-32.55%

+14.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.61%

-53.58%

+19.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.61%

-56.11%

+22.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-1.33%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-16.43%

+8.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

4.16%

-1.54%

Volatility

NXTG vs. AIVC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) is 8.27%, while Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) has a volatility of 11.07%. This indicates that NXTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIVC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NXTGAIVCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.27%

11.07%

-2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.26%

23.72%

-8.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.44%

29.71%

-11.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.93%

30.20%

-12.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.88%

26.93%

-8.05%

NXTG vs. AIVC - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXTG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than AIVC's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

NXTG vs. AIVC - Dividend Comparison

NXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, more than AIVC's 0.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVC
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
0.10%0.17%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.39%1.16%0.38%0.92%0.64%0.00%
NXTG
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF
1.11%1.56%1.51%2.15%2.04%1.97%1.04%0.77%1.27%1.65%1.23%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


NXTG and AIVC have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIVC has higher volatility (11.07%) compared to NXTG (8.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXTG dropped -33.61% vs AIVC's -56.11%.

On 10-year performance, NXTG leads with 17.94% vs 17.12% for AIVC. On fees, AIVC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, NXTG has been the lower-risk option at 8.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NXTG has performed better with a 17.94% return vs 17.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIVC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for NXTG.

NXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.10% for AIVC.

NXTG tracks Indxx 5G & NextG Thematic Index, while AIVC tracks Bloomberg AI Value Chain Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for NXTG and 0.59% for AIVC.

AIVC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.14 vs 4.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NXTG and AIVC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer