PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NXT.L vs. LUG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NXT.L vs. LUG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Next plc (NXT.L) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NXT.L is traded in GBp, while LUG.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the LUG.TO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXT.L achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly higher than LUG.TO's -25.24% return. Over the past 10 years, NXT.L has underperformed LUG.TO with an annualized return of 13.43%, while LUG.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 31.85% annualized return.


NXT.L

1D
1.50%
1M
7.17%
YTD
1.52%
6M
-2.20%
1Y
9.85%
3Y*
32.21%
5Y*
14.21%
10Y*
13.43%

LUG.TO

1D
-2.19%
1M
-3.93%
YTD
-25.24%
6M
-22.01%
1Y
28.56%
3Y*
71.67%
5Y*
51.46%
10Y*
31.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXT.L vs. LUG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NXT.L
Next plc
1.52%46.85%19.71%43.86%-24.92%16.60%0.97%81.00%-8.33%-2.52%
LUG.TO
Lundin Gold Inc.
-25.24%280.86%79.55%25.89%36.37%-3.05%29.91%68.60%7.62%-15.90%

Correlation

The correlation between NXT.L and LUG.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2009

0.04

The correlation between NXT.L and LUG.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (10 years) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NXT.L:

£16.57B

LUG.TO:

CA$20.61B

EPS

NXT.L:

£11.72

LUG.TO:

CA$3.77

PE Ratio

NXT.L:

11.54

LUG.TO:

22.50

PEG Ratio

NXT.L:

1.16

LUG.TO:

0.30

PS Ratio

NXT.L:

1.44

LUG.TO:

10.29

PB Ratio

NXT.L:

9.96

LUG.TO:

15.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

NXT.L:

£11.39B

LUG.TO:

CA$2.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NXT.L:

£5.00B

LUG.TO:

CA$1.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

NXT.L:

£2.41B

LUG.TO:

CA$1.43B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NXT.L vs. LUG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXT.L
NXT.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
NXT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
NXT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

LUG.TO
LUG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
LUG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LUG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXT.L vs. LUG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Next plc (NXT.L) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NXT.LLUG.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.13

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

0.83

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.58

2.18

-0.61

NXT.L vs. LUG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXT.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is comparable to the LUG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXT.L and LUG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NXT.LLUG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

0.52

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

1.12

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.73

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.29

+0.19

Drawdowns

NXT.L vs. LUG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXT.L drawdown since its inception was -91.55%, which is greater than LUG.TO's maximum drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXT.L and LUG.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NXT.LLUG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.55%

-79.36%

-12.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.96%

-34.44%

+19.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.96%

-34.44%

+19.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.80%

-34.44%

-11.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.81%

-41.74%

-12.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.16%

-34.04%

+29.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.06%

-35.82%

+18.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.19%

13.13%

-6.94%

Volatility

NXT.L vs. LUG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Next plc (NXT.L) is 7.69%, while Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) has a volatility of 17.17%. This indicates that NXT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NXT.LLUG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.69%

17.17%

-9.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.70%

40.22%

-23.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.17%

54.96%

-31.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.30%

46.12%

-19.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.22%

43.59%

-12.37%

Dividends

NXT.L vs. LUG.TO - Dividend Comparison

NXT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, less than LUG.TO's 5.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LUG.TO
Lundin Gold Inc.
5.20%3.37%2.69%3.28%1.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NXT.L
Next plc
4.47%1.79%2.27%2.54%6.08%1.35%0.00%2.39%5.14%6.48%4.37%5.25%

Financials

NXT.L vs. LUG.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Next plc and Lundin Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
3.76B
567.38M
(NXT.L) Total Revenue
(LUG.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. NXT.L values in GBp, LUG.TO values in CAD

NXT.L vs. LUG.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Next plc and Lundin Gold Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
44.6%
74.2%
Portfolio components
NXT.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Next plc reported a gross profit of 1.68B and revenue of 3.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.6%.

LUG.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 420.70M and revenue of 567.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.2%.

NXT.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Next plc reported an operating income of 730.10M and revenue of 3.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.4%.

LUG.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 391.03M and revenue of 567.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 68.9%.

NXT.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Next plc reported a net income of 509.00M and revenue of 3.76B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.

LUG.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lundin Gold Inc. reported a net income of 273.33M and revenue of 567.38M, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NXT.L and LUG.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NXT.L and LUG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer