PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NXP vs. SHM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NXP vs. SHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXP achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly higher than SHM's 0.78% return. Over the past 10 years, NXP has outperformed SHM with an annualized return of 3.11%, while SHM has yielded a comparatively lower 1.20% annualized return.


NXP

1D
-0.63%
1M
1.59%
YTD
2.83%
6M
0.57%
1Y
6.14%
3Y*
3.83%
5Y*
-1.04%
10Y*
3.11%

SHM

1D
0.04%
1M
0.39%
YTD
0.78%
6M
1.08%
1Y
3.47%
3Y*
2.93%
5Y*
0.91%
10Y*
1.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXP vs. SHM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NXP
Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio
2.83%-2.73%6.83%10.68%-9.51%-7.36%12.12%20.94%0.04%9.30%
SHM
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF
0.78%3.95%1.22%2.92%-3.82%-0.37%2.65%3.64%1.56%0.99%

Correlation

The correlation between NXP and SHM is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2007

0.13

The correlation between NXP and SHM shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NXP vs. SHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXP
NXP Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXP Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
NXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXP Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SHM
SHM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHM Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXP vs. SHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NXPSHMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.59

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

3.08

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.60

7.88

-3.28

NXP vs. SHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXP Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the SHM Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXP and SHM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NXPSHMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

2.76

-1.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

0.44

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.36

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.48

-0.21

Drawdowns

NXP vs. SHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXP drawdown since its inception was -27.64%, which is greater than SHM's maximum drawdown of -11.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXP and SHM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NXPSHMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.64%

-11.61%

-16.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.37%

-1.13%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.68%

-2.03%

-8.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.64%

-6.67%

-20.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.64%

-11.61%

-16.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.17%

-0.37%

-6.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-0.97%

-5.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

0.44%

+0.90%

Volatility

NXP vs. SHM - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio (NXP) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF (SHM) at 0.35%. This indicates that NXP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NXPSHMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

0.35%

+2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.85%

0.85%

+5.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.36%

1.26%

+6.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.74%

2.07%

+8.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.07%

3.31%

+8.76%

Dividends

NXP vs. SHM - Dividend Comparison

NXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than SHM's 2.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NXP
Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income Portfolio
4.48%4.47%4.00%3.94%3.93%3.42%3.07%3.33%3.88%3.79%3.96%3.99%
SHM
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF
2.67%2.61%2.06%1.15%0.69%0.86%1.24%1.40%1.23%1.06%0.94%0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


NXP and SHM have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NXP has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to SHM (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXP dropped -27.64% vs SHM's -11.61%.

SHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NXP and SHM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer