PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NXG vs. GLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NXG vs. GLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) and Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund (GLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NXG vs. GLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NXG
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund
11.11%28.75%51.16%4.54%-5.68%
GLV
Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund
2.08%23.01%17.85%-8.45%-6.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXG achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly higher than GLV's 2.08% return.


NXG

1D
-0.92%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
11.11%
6M
18.12%
1Y
35.48%
3Y*
32.28%
5Y*
10Y*

GLV

1D
0.17%
1M
-5.29%
YTD
2.08%
6M
4.60%
1Y
20.58%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
-2.12%
10Y*
4.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NXG vs. GLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXG has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GLV's 0.02% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NXG vs. GLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXG
NXG Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
NXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXG Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
NXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXG Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

GLV
GLV Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
GLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
GLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXG vs. GLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) and Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund (GLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NXGGLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

1.33

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

1.91

-0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.29

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

2.54

-0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.98

8.20

-2.23

NXG vs. GLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXG Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the GLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXG and GLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NXGGLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.33

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.21

+0.72

Correlation

The correlation between NXG and GLV is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NXG vs. GLV - Dividend Comparison

NXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.82%, more than GLV's 10.85% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NXG
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund
11.82%12.67%14.15%12.00%1.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GLV
Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund
10.85%10.57%11.64%13.92%16.99%10.82%11.67%11.17%13.68%10.00%11.26%10.69%

Drawdowns

NXG vs. GLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXG drawdown since its inception was -26.14%, smaller than the maximum GLV drawdown of -61.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXG and GLV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NXGGLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.14%

-61.66%

+35.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.94%

-8.33%

-12.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.72%

-14.13%

+10.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-14.93%

+8.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.81%

2.58%

+3.23%

Volatility

NXG vs. GLV - Volatility Comparison

NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) has a higher volatility of 7.41% compared to Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund (GLV) at 5.40%. This indicates that NXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NXGGLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.41%

5.40%

+2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.01%

9.73%

+2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.72%

15.57%

+10.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.90%

17.64%

+9.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.90%

19.82%

+7.08%