PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NXG vs. BSTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NXG vs. BSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) and BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust (BSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXG achieves a 25.48% return, which is significantly lower than BSTZ's 28.07% return.


NXG

1D
0.51%
1M
1.70%
6M
23.99%
YTD
25.48%
1Y
36.00%
3Y*
31.81%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.23%

BSTZ

1D
0.40%
1M
-10.47%
6M
26.89%
YTD
28.07%
1Y
44.49%
3Y*
27.66%
5Y*
3.19%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXG vs. BSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NXG
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund
25.48%25.98%51.16%4.54%-4.87%
BSTZ
BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust
28.07%25.06%37.49%18.72%-7.43%

Correlation

The correlation between NXG and BSTZ is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2022

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NXG vs. BSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXG
NXG Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
NXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXG Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
NXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

BSTZ
BSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXG vs. BSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) and BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust (BSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NXGBSTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.29

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

3.58

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.40

11.56

-4.16

NXG vs. BSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXG Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the BSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXG and BSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NXG vs. BSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXG drawdown since its inception was -26.14%, smaller than the maximum BSTZ drawdown of -60.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXG and BSTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NXGBSTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.14%

-60.51%

+34.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.19%

-12.49%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.14%

-25.31%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.78%

-12.14%

+4.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.46%

-27.18%

+20.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.91%

3.86%

+1.05%

Volatility

NXG vs. BSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) is 8.85%, while BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust (BSTZ) has a volatility of 11.41%. This indicates that NXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NXGBSTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.85%

11.41%

-2.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.15%

23.50%

-7.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.02%

26.71%

-5.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.87%

28.09%

-1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.87%

30.40%

-3.53%

Dividends

NXG vs. BSTZ - Dividend Comparison

NXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.17%, more than BSTZ's 8.72% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BSTZ
BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust
8.72%12.46%9.75%10.90%14.73%5.14%3.42%2.44%
NXG
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund
11.17%12.83%14.15%12.00%1.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NXG and BSTZ have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSTZ has higher volatility (11.41%) compared to NXG (8.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXG dropped -26.14% vs BSTZ's -60.51%.

NXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NXG and BSTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer