PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BSTZ vs. CEFS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


BSTZCEFS
YTD Return32.33%22.97%
1Y Return43.89%34.94%
3Y Return (Ann)-12.95%11.05%
5Y Return (Ann)9.63%11.98%
Sharpe Ratio2.123.28
Sortino Ratio2.834.39
Omega Ratio1.351.58
Calmar Ratio0.775.29
Martin Ratio8.5220.55
Ulcer Index4.94%1.72%
Daily Std Dev19.86%10.79%
Max Drawdown-59.31%-38.99%
Current Drawdown-34.83%-2.19%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between BSTZ and CEFS is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

BSTZ vs. CEFS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BSTZ achieves a 32.33% return, which is significantly higher than CEFS's 22.97% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
18.90%
11.38%
BSTZ
CEFS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BSTZ vs. CEFS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Science and Technology Trust II (BSTZ) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSTZ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BSTZ, currently valued at 2.12, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.002.12
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BSTZ, currently valued at 2.83, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.83
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BSTZ, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BSTZ, currently valued at 0.77, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.77
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BSTZ, currently valued at 8.52, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.008.52
CEFS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CEFS, currently valued at 3.28, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.003.28
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CEFS, currently valued at 4.39, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.004.39
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CEFS, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.58
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CEFS, currently valued at 5.29, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.005.29
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CEFS, currently valued at 20.55, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0020.55

BSTZ vs. CEFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSTZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is lower than the CEFS Sharpe Ratio of 3.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSTZ and CEFS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.12
3.28
BSTZ
CEFS

Dividends

BSTZ vs. CEFS - Dividend Comparison

BSTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%, more than CEFS's 8.00% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017
BSTZ
BlackRock Science and Technology Trust II
8.80%10.90%14.73%7.92%3.42%2.44%0.00%0.00%
CEFS
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF
8.00%9.20%11.32%10.73%8.61%7.56%9.81%6.24%

Drawdowns

BSTZ vs. CEFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSTZ drawdown since its inception was -59.31%, which is greater than CEFS's maximum drawdown of -38.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSTZ and CEFS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-34.83%
-2.19%
BSTZ
CEFS

Volatility

BSTZ vs. CEFS - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Science and Technology Trust II (BSTZ) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) at 2.08%. This indicates that BSTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.98%
2.08%
BSTZ
CEFS