NXG vs. AGD
NXG (NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund) and AGD (abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund) are both Global Equity Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, NXG returned 35.01%/yr vs 23.04%/yr for AGD. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NXG charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for AGD.
Performance
NXG vs. AGD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NXG achieves a 24.20% return, which is significantly higher than AGD's 13.13% return.
NXG
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 24.20%
- 6M
- 24.75%
- 1Y
- 39.68%
- 3Y*
- 35.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGD
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- 13.13%
- 6M
- 14.59%
- 1Y
- 36.12%
- 3Y*
- 23.04%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- 13.34%
NXG vs. AGD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NXG NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund | 24.20% | 25.98% | 51.16% | 4.54% | -5.68% |
AGD abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund | 13.13% | 34.31% | 16.39% | 7.36% | 8.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between NXG and AGD is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2022 | 0.34 |
The correlation between NXG and AGD shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NXG vs. AGD — Risk / Return Rank
NXG
AGD
NXG vs. AGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) and abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund (AGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NXG | AGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.30 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 1.79 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.32 | 3.85 | +4.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NXG | AGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 1.52 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 0.18 | +0.82 |
Drawdowns
NXG vs. AGD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NXG drawdown since its inception was -26.14%, smaller than the maximum AGD drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXG and AGD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NXG | AGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.14% | -76.36% | +50.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.19% | -20.25% | +7.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.14% | -20.25% | -5.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -2.16% | +1.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.60% | -29.90% | +23.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 9.42% | -4.64% |
Volatility
NXG vs. AGD - Volatility Comparison
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund (AGD) at 4.22%. This indicates that NXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NXG | AGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.13% | 4.22% | +1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.04% | 16.32% | -2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.12% | 23.88% | -4.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.88% | 18.98% | +7.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.88% | 19.60% | +7.28% |
NXG vs. AGD - Expense Ratio Comparison
NXG has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than AGD's 1.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
NXG vs. AGD - Dividend Comparison
NXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.86%, less than AGD's 11.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGD abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund | 11.07% | 11.41% | 10.46% | 8.35% | 8.25% | 6.45% | 7.47% | 7.50% | 9.17% | 7.22% | 8.89% | 8.77% |
NXG NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund | 10.86% | 12.83% | 14.15% | 12.00% | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NXG and AGD have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NXG has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to AGD (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXG dropped -26.14% vs AGD's -76.36%.
NXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NXG and AGD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer