NWZNX vs. GRISX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

NWZNX (Nationwide Loomis All Cap Growth Fund) and GRISX (Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund) are both mutual funds - NWZNX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Nationwide, while GRISX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 5 years, NWZNX returned 8.48%/yr vs 12.15%/yr for GRISX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. NWZNX charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for GRISX.

Performance

NWZNX vs. GRISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Loomis All Cap Growth Fund (NWZNX) and Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund (GRISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWZNX achieves a -6.11% return, which is significantly lower than GRISX's 9.12% return.

NWZNX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -3.65%
• 6M: -4.19%
• YTD: -6.11%
• 1Y: -1.78%
• 3Y*: 13.94%
• 5Y*: 8.48%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.68%

GRISX

• 1D: 1.67%
• 1M: -0.59%
• 6M: 7.58%
• YTD: 9.12%
• 1Y: 20.24%
• 3Y*: 18.38%
• 5Y*: 12.15%
• 10Y*: 14.61%
• ALL TIME*: 8.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GRISX Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
NWZNX Nationwide Loomis All Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

NWZNX vs. GRISX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NWZNX Nationwide Loomis All Cap Growth Fund	-6.11%	13.28%	32.96%	44.70%	-27.67%	16.89%	30.82%	30.51%	-2.95%	12.69%
GRISX Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund	9.12%	17.41%	24.13%	25.55%	-18.49%	28.32%	17.92%	30.94%	-3.84%	10.77%

Correlation

The correlation between NWZNX and GRISX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2017	0.91

The correlation between NWZNX and GRISX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NWZNX vs. GRISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NWZNX

NWZNX Risk / Return Rank: 3
NWZNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
NWZNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
NWZNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
NWZNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
NWZNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

GRISX

GRISX Risk / Return Rank: 58
GRISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
GRISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
GRISX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
GRISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
GRISX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NWZNX vs. GRISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Loomis All Cap Growth Fund (NWZNX) and Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund (GRISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NWZNX	GRISX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	1.39	-1.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.18	1.95	-2.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.25	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	2.00	-2.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.45	8.58	-9.03

NWZNX vs. GRISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWZNX Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the GRISX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWZNX and GRISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NWZNX vs. GRISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWZNX drawdown since its inception was -36.41%, smaller than the maximum GRISX drawdown of -55.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWZNX and GRISX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NWZNX	GRISX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.41%	-55.53%	+19.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.85%	-8.95%	-10.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.01%	-18.78%	-5.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.41%	-24.75%	-11.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.91%	-2.17%	-9.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.27%	-10.80%	+3.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.34%	2.09%	+6.25%

Volatility

NWZNX vs. GRISX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Loomis All Cap Growth Fund (NWZNX) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund (GRISX) at 3.45%. This indicates that NWZNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NWZNX	GRISX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.08%	3.45%	+1.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.75%	10.09%	+3.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.51%	12.87%	+4.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.73%	17.05%	+5.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.78%	18.08%	+3.70%

NWZNX vs. GRISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWZNX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than GRISX's 0.44% expense ratio.

Dividends

NWZNX vs. GRISX - Dividend Comparison

NWZNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.19%, more than GRISX's 4.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GRISX Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund	4.70%	5.08%	2.62%	0.79%	1.67%	4.96%	1.27%	6.26%	18.54%	6.66%	7.42%	11.98%
NWZNX Nationwide Loomis All Cap Growth Fund	9.19%	8.63%	9.42%	7.12%	8.43%	10.57%	2.57%	1.35%	8.44%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NWZNX and GRISX in my portfolio?

NWZNX and GRISX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NWZNX or GRISX?

NWZNX has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to GRISX (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWZNX dropped -36.41% vs GRISX's -55.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GRISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.