PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWWVX vs. FFSZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NWWVX vs. FFSZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Destination 2060 Fund (NWWVX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWWVX achieves a 11.57% return, which is significantly lower than FFSZX's 15.07% return.


NWWVX

1D
1.15%
1M
1.80%
YTD
11.57%
6M
11.40%
1Y
26.90%
3Y*
17.48%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
10.48%

FFSZX

1D
1.50%
1M
3.35%
YTD
15.07%
6M
15.13%
1Y
32.79%
3Y*
20.37%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWWVX vs. FFSZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NWWVX
Nationwide Destination 2060 Fund
11.57%19.40%13.20%20.31%-18.83%17.25%13.62%4.99%
FFSZX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6
15.07%24.08%14.41%20.78%-18.05%16.81%18.36%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between NWWVX and FFSZX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.96

The correlation between NWWVX and FFSZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWWVX vs. FFSZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWWVX
NWWVX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NWWVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWWVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWWVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
NWWVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWWVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FFSZX
FFSZX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FFSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWWVX vs. FFSZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Destination 2060 Fund (NWWVX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NWWVXFFSZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.44

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

3.32

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.98

14.57

-1.59

NWWVX vs. FFSZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWWVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the FFSZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWWVX and FFSZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NWWVX vs. FFSZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWWVX drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, which is greater than FFSZX's maximum drawdown of -31.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWWVX and FFSZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWWVXFFSZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.31%

-31.00%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-9.77%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.05%

-15.36%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.71%

-27.17%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

0.00%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.26%

-5.78%

-0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

2.22%

-0.18%

Volatility

NWWVX vs. FFSZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nationwide Destination 2060 Fund (NWWVX) is 5.04%, while Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that NWWVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFSZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWWVXFFSZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

5.85%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.46%

11.75%

-1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.53%

13.73%

-1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.93%

15.19%

+0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.68%

17.11%

-0.43%

NWWVX vs. FFSZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWWVX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FFSZX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

NWWVX vs. FFSZX - Dividend Comparison

NWWVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.92%, more than FFSZX's 4.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFSZX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6
4.98%3.82%2.92%2.26%8.99%7.98%2.41%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NWWVX
Nationwide Destination 2060 Fund
7.92%9.08%12.90%4.32%2.24%8.22%6.69%3.93%7.98%3.85%3.27%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, NWWVX and FFSZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFSZX has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to NWWVX (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWWVX dropped -34.31% vs FFSZX's -31.00%.

FFSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWWVX and FFSZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer