PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWWVX vs. DRIJX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NWWVX vs. DRIJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Destination 2060 Fund (NWWVX) and Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NWWVX having a 10.64% return and DRIJX slightly lower at 10.36%. Over the past 10 years, NWWVX has underperformed DRIJX with an annualized return of 10.36%, while DRIJX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.53% annualized return.


NWWVX

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.16%
6M
9.95%
YTD
10.64%
1Y
20.29%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
10.36%

DRIJX

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.55%
6M
9.77%
YTD
10.36%
1Y
20.25%
3Y*
18.35%
5Y*
11.04%
10Y*
12.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWWVX vs. DRIJX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NWWVX
Nationwide Destination 2060 Fund
10.64%19.40%13.20%20.31%-18.83%17.25%13.62%21.03%-9.07%17.51%
DRIJX
Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
10.36%19.64%17.05%21.37%-15.25%21.63%14.09%25.59%-9.14%21.76%

Correlation

The correlation between NWWVX and DRIJX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.97

The correlation between NWWVX and DRIJX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWWVX vs. DRIJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWWVX
NWWVX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
NWWVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWWVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWWVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
NWWVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWWVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIJX
DRIJX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
DRIJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIJX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIJX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWWVX vs. DRIJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Destination 2060 Fund (NWWVX) and Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NWWVXDRIJXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.35

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

2.61

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.06

11.39

-1.33

NWWVX vs. DRIJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWWVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the DRIJX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWWVX and DRIJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NWWVX vs. DRIJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWWVX drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, roughly equal to the maximum DRIJX drawdown of -33.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWWVX and DRIJX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWWVXDRIJXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.31%

-33.55%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-8.12%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.05%

-15.25%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.71%

-23.49%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.31%

-33.55%

-0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-1.19%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.25%

-4.17%

-2.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.85%

+0.22%

Volatility

NWWVX vs. DRIJX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Destination 2060 Fund (NWWVX) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIJX) at 4.51%. This indicates that NWWVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRIJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWWVXDRIJXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

4.51%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.62%

9.14%

+1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.64%

10.94%

+1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.95%

14.65%

+1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.57%

15.55%

+1.02%

NWWVX vs. DRIJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWWVX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIJX's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

NWWVX vs. DRIJX - Dividend Comparison

NWWVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.25%, more than DRIJX's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRIJX
Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
2.36%2.49%2.53%3.40%3.98%2.87%4.15%2.18%2.29%1.25%1.40%0.00%
NWWVX
Nationwide Destination 2060 Fund
8.25%9.08%12.90%4.32%2.24%8.22%6.69%3.93%7.98%3.85%3.27%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, NWWVX and DRIJX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NWWVX has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to DRIJX (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWWVX dropped -34.31% vs DRIJX's -33.55%.

DRIJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWWVX and DRIJX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer