PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWN vs. WMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NWN vs. WMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NWN having a 8.81% return and WMT slightly higher at 9.07%. Over the past 10 years, NWN has underperformed WMT with an annualized return of 2.01%, while WMT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.77% annualized return.


NWN

1D
1.18%
1M
0.30%
YTD
8.81%
6M
8.72%
1Y
29.18%
3Y*
9.60%
5Y*
2.37%
10Y*
2.01%

WMT

1D
0.45%
1M
-7.93%
YTD
9.07%
6M
4.13%
1Y
28.71%
3Y*
34.18%
5Y*
22.42%
10Y*
19.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWN vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NWN
Northwest Natural Holding Company
8.81%23.75%6.77%-14.45%1.49%10.26%-35.52%25.46%4.48%2.82%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
9.07%24.49%73.99%12.88%-0.46%1.97%23.32%30.16%-3.43%46.56%

Correlation

The correlation between NWN and WMT is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.21

Fundamentals

EPS

NWN:

$4.01

WMT:

$2.88

PE Ratio

NWN:

12.44

WMT:

42.04

PEG Ratio

NWN:

3.27

WMT:

2.75

PS Ratio

NWN:

1.19

WMT:

1.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

NWN:

$1.29B

WMT:

$725.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NWN:

$288.00M

WMT:

$181.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

NWN:

$426.96M

WMT:

$44.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWN vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWN
NWN Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
NWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWN Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWN Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

WMT
WMT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWN vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NWNWMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.23

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

1.83

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.44

5.82

+0.62

NWN vs. WMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWN Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the WMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWN and WMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NWN vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWN drawdown since its inception was -46.27%, smaller than the maximum WMT drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWN and WMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWNWMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.27%

-77.14%

+30.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.46%

-15.75%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.39%

-21.93%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.09%

-25.74%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.27%

-25.74%

-20.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.45%

-9.81%

-5.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.14%

-14.63%

+2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.55%

4.94%

-0.39%

Volatility

NWN vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) is 6.76%, while Walmart Inc. (WMT) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that NWN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWNWMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

9.86%

-3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.76%

18.49%

-2.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.07%

23.67%

-3.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.88%

21.68%

+1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.15%

21.73%

+6.42%

Dividends

NWN vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison

NWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than WMT's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NWN
Northwest Natural Holding Company
3.95%4.20%4.94%4.99%4.06%3.94%4.16%2.58%3.13%3.16%3.13%3.68%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.80%0.84%0.92%1.45%1.58%1.52%1.50%1.78%2.23%2.07%2.89%3.20%

Financials

NWN vs. WMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Northwest Natural Holding Company and Walmart Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
490.40M
177.75B
(NWN) Total Revenue
(WMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NWN vs. WMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Northwest Natural Holding Company and Walmart Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%202220232024202520260
25.1%
Portfolio components
NWN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northwest Natural Holding Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 490.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

WMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.69B and revenue of 177.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

NWN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northwest Natural Holding Company reported an operating income of 162.87M and revenue of 490.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 33.2%.

WMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported an operating income of 7.49B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

NWN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northwest Natural Holding Company reported a net income of 97.49M and revenue of 490.40M, resulting in a net margin of 19.9%.

WMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NWN and WMT have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WMT has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to NWN (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWN dropped -46.27% vs WMT's -77.14%.

NWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWN and WMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer