PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWN vs. MSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NWN vs. MSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) and MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWN achieves a 6.78% return, which is significantly higher than MSA's -0.18% return. Over the past 10 years, NWN has underperformed MSA with an annualized return of 1.85%, while MSA has yielded a comparatively higher 13.54% annualized return.


NWN

1D
-1.71%
1M
-2.99%
YTD
6.78%
6M
8.05%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
8.99%
5Y*
2.11%
10Y*
1.85%

MSA

1D
-1.46%
1M
-6.18%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
-0.35%
1Y
-2.56%
3Y*
2.22%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
13.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWN vs. MSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NWN
Northwest Natural Holding Company
6.78%23.75%6.77%-14.45%1.49%10.26%-35.52%25.46%4.48%2.82%
MSA
MSA Safety Incorporated
-0.18%-2.14%-0.71%18.52%-3.15%2.14%19.79%36.10%23.61%13.97%

Correlation

The correlation between NWN and MSA is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990

0.26

The correlation between NWN and MSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

NWN:

$4.01

MSA:

$9.85

PE Ratio

NWN:

12.21

MSA:

16.13

PEG Ratio

NWN:

3.21

MSA:

0.06

PS Ratio

NWN:

1.17

MSA:

2.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

NWN:

$1.29B

MSA:

$1.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NWN:

$288.00M

MSA:

$897.30M

EBITDA (TTM)

NWN:

$426.96M

MSA:

$465.55M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWN vs. MSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWN
NWN Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWN Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWN Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

MSA
MSA Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSA Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSA Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWN vs. MSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) and MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NWNMSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.00

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

-0.12

+2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.57

-0.26

+6.83

NWN vs. MSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWN Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the MSA Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWN and MSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NWNMSADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

-0.11

+1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.01

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

0.47

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.34

-0.03

Drawdowns

NWN vs. MSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWN drawdown since its inception was -46.27%, smaller than the maximum MSA drawdown of -70.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWN and MSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWNMSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.27%

-70.32%

+24.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.46%

-21.29%

+7.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.39%

-34.28%

+15.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.09%

-34.28%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.27%

-38.39%

-7.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.02%

-21.29%

+4.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.14%

-17.44%

+5.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.37%

9.79%

-5.42%

Volatility

NWN vs. MSA - Volatility Comparison

Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) and MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) have volatilities of 6.35% and 6.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWNMSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.35%

6.61%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.58%

17.65%

-2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.02%

23.93%

-3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.87%

24.71%

-1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.15%

28.78%

-0.63%

Dividends

NWN vs. MSA - Dividend Comparison

NWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than MSA's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSA
MSA Safety Incorporated
1.34%1.31%1.21%1.11%1.26%1.16%1.14%1.30%1.58%1.78%1.89%2.92%
NWN
Northwest Natural Holding Company
4.02%4.20%4.94%4.99%4.06%3.94%4.16%2.58%3.13%3.16%3.13%3.68%

Financials

NWN vs. MSA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Northwest Natural Holding Company and MSA Safety Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
490.40M
463.63M
(NWN) Total Revenue
(MSA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NWN vs. MSA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Northwest Natural Holding Company and MSA Safety Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%202220232024202520260
47.4%
Portfolio components
NWN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northwest Natural Holding Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 490.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported a gross profit of 219.58M and revenue of 463.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.4%.

NWN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northwest Natural Holding Company reported an operating income of 162.87M and revenue of 490.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 33.2%.

MSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported an operating income of 93.01M and revenue of 463.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.

NWN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northwest Natural Holding Company reported a net income of 97.49M and revenue of 490.40M, resulting in a net margin of 19.9%.

MSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported a net income of 71.27M and revenue of 463.63M, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NWN and MSA have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSA has higher volatility (6.61%) compared to NWN (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWN dropped -46.27% vs MSA's -70.32%.

NWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWN and MSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer