PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWN vs. LEG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NWN vs. LEG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWN achieves a 6.78% return, which is significantly higher than LEG's -8.64% return. Over the past 10 years, NWN has outperformed LEG with an annualized return of 1.85%, while LEG has yielded a comparatively lower -11.64% annualized return.


NWN

1D
-1.71%
1M
-2.99%
YTD
6.78%
6M
8.05%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
8.99%
5Y*
2.11%
10Y*
1.85%

LEG

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.60%
YTD
-8.64%
6M
-8.50%
1Y
12.07%
3Y*
-29.34%
5Y*
-25.68%
10Y*
-11.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWN vs. LEG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NWN
Northwest Natural Holding Company
6.78%23.75%6.77%-14.45%1.49%10.26%-35.52%25.46%4.48%2.82%
LEG
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated
-8.64%17.02%-61.93%-13.45%-17.78%-3.76%-9.05%47.13%-22.25%0.58%

Correlation

The correlation between NWN and LEG is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990

0.27

The correlation between NWN and LEG shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

NWN:

$4.01

LEG:

$1.60

PE Ratio

NWN:

12.21

LEG:

6.25

PS Ratio

NWN:

1.17

LEG:

0.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

NWN:

$1.29B

LEG:

$3.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NWN:

$288.00M

LEG:

$717.40M

EBITDA (TTM)

NWN:

$426.96M

LEG:

$433.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWN vs. LEG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWN
NWN Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWN Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWN Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

LEG
LEG Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
LEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
LEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEG Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWN vs. LEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NWNLEGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.09

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

0.43

+1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.57

0.89

+5.68

NWN vs. LEG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWN Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the LEG Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWN and LEG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NWNLEGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

0.25

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

-0.61

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

-0.29

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.20

+0.11

Drawdowns

NWN vs. LEG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWN drawdown since its inception was -46.27%, smaller than the maximum LEG drawdown of -86.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWN and LEG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWNLEGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.27%

-86.41%

+40.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.46%

-28.51%

+15.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.39%

-77.39%

+59.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.09%

-85.42%

+53.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.27%

-86.41%

+40.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.02%

-78.87%

+61.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.14%

-19.63%

+7.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.37%

13.58%

-9.21%

Volatility

NWN vs. LEG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) is 6.35%, while Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) has a volatility of 11.27%. This indicates that NWN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWNLEGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.35%

11.27%

-4.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.58%

30.79%

-15.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.02%

49.55%

-29.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.87%

42.40%

-19.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.15%

39.77%

-11.62%

Dividends

NWN vs. LEG - Dividend Comparison

NWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than LEG's 2.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LEG
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated
2.00%1.82%6.35%6.95%5.40%4.03%3.61%3.11%4.19%2.98%2.74%3.00%
NWN
Northwest Natural Holding Company
4.02%4.20%4.94%4.99%4.06%3.94%4.16%2.58%3.13%3.16%3.13%3.68%

Financials

NWN vs. LEG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Northwest Natural Holding Company and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
490.40M
0
(NWN) Total Revenue
(LEG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NWN and LEG have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEG has higher volatility (11.27%) compared to NWN (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWN dropped -46.27% vs LEG's -86.41%.

NWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWN and LEG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer