PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWMSX vs. FRAMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NWMSX vs. FRAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Destination 2040 Fund (NWMSX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWMSX achieves a 9.77% return, which is significantly higher than FRAMX's 3.94% return. Over the past 10 years, NWMSX has outperformed FRAMX with an annualized return of 8.79%, while FRAMX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.94% annualized return.


NWMSX

1D
0.10%
1M
4.37%
YTD
9.77%
6M
10.55%
1Y
23.03%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
8.79%

FRAMX

1D
0.21%
1M
1.52%
YTD
3.94%
6M
4.15%
1Y
10.14%
3Y*
7.28%
5Y*
2.63%
10Y*
3.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWMSX vs. FRAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NWMSX
Nationwide Destination 2040 Fund
9.77%17.51%11.63%18.59%-18.29%15.03%13.50%19.70%-8.44%10.47%
FRAMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A
3.94%9.55%4.04%7.80%-11.87%2.52%8.30%10.28%-2.05%6.82%

Correlation

The correlation between NWMSX and FRAMX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007

0.87

The correlation between NWMSX and FRAMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (10 years) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWMSX vs. FRAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWMSX
NWMSX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NWMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NWMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FRAMX
FRAMX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FRAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FRAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWMSX vs. FRAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Destination 2040 Fund (NWMSX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NWMSXFRAMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.49

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

2.96

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.48

12.58

+0.90

NWMSX vs. FRAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWMSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the FRAMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWMSX and FRAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NWMSXFRAMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.46

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.50

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.88

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.52

-0.16

Drawdowns

NWMSX vs. FRAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWMSX drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, which is greater than FRAMX's maximum drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWMSX and FRAMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWMSXFRAMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.33%

-33.94%

-21.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

-3.45%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.62%

-5.02%

-7.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.39%

-16.31%

-14.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.80%

-16.31%

-16.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.31%

-3.83%

-5.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

0.81%

+0.92%

Volatility

NWMSX vs. FRAMX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Destination 2040 Fund (NWMSX) has a higher volatility of 3.10% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX) at 1.67%. This indicates that NWMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWMSXFRAMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

1.67%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.05%

3.43%

+4.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.05%

4.16%

+5.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.24%

5.28%

+8.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.17%

4.52%

+10.65%

NWMSX vs. FRAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWMSX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FRAMX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

NWMSX vs. FRAMX - Dividend Comparison

NWMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.95%, more than FRAMX's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRAMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A
2.84%2.77%2.77%2.58%4.26%3.31%2.23%2.37%4.40%8.26%1.42%1.42%
NWMSX
Nationwide Destination 2040 Fund
7.95%8.66%14.65%6.81%2.49%9.45%6.28%7.29%11.84%1.98%8.03%5.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


NWMSX and FRAMX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NWMSX has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to FRAMX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWMSX dropped -55.33% vs FRAMX's -33.94%.

FRAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWMSX and FRAMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer