PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWLSX vs. SSFNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NWLSX vs. SSFNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund (NWLSX) and State Street Target Retirement Fund (SSFNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWLSX achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly higher than SSFNX's 5.13% return. Over the past 10 years, NWLSX has outperformed SSFNX with an annualized return of 8.09%, while SSFNX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.61% annualized return.


NWLSX

1D
1.51%
1M
-0.10%
6M
5.48%
YTD
7.50%
1Y
16.19%
3Y*
12.64%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*
8.09%
ALL TIME*
6.26%

SSFNX

1D
0.59%
1M
0.00%
6M
3.48%
YTD
5.13%
1Y
10.22%
3Y*
8.89%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*
5.61%
ALL TIME*
5.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NWLSX vs. SSFNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NWLSX
Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund
7.50%16.16%10.17%17.00%-17.70%13.33%12.81%18.63%-8.01%15.06%
SSFNX
State Street Target Retirement Fund
5.13%10.93%7.05%10.73%-12.21%6.87%10.26%13.97%-2.49%8.92%

Correlation

The correlation between NWLSX and SSFNX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014

0.91

The correlation between NWLSX and SSFNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWLSX vs. SSFNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NWLSX
NWLSX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NWLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
NWLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SSFNX
SSFNX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SSFNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSFNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSFNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SSFNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSFNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NWLSX vs. SSFNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund (NWLSX) and State Street Target Retirement Fund (SSFNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NWLSXSSFNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.41

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

2.83

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.41

12.28

-2.86

NWLSX vs. SSFNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the SSFNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWLSX and SSFNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NWLSX vs. SSFNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWLSX drawdown since its inception was -52.58%, which is greater than SSFNX's maximum drawdown of -16.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWLSX and SSFNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWLSXSSFNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.58%

-16.62%

-35.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.97%

-3.52%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.73%

-5.21%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.54%

-16.62%

-12.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.59%

-16.62%

-13.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-0.42%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.51%

-2.49%

-6.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

0.81%

+0.80%

Volatility

NWLSX vs. SSFNX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund (NWLSX) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to State Street Target Retirement Fund (SSFNX) at 1.23%. This indicates that NWLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSFNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWLSXSSFNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

1.23%

+1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.12%

3.97%

+4.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.66%

4.78%

+4.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.04%

6.63%

+6.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.64%

6.56%

+7.08%

NWLSX vs. SSFNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWLSX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SSFNX's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

NWLSX vs. SSFNX - Dividend Comparison

NWLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.80%, more than SSFNX's 4.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NWLSX
Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund
7.80%8.36%14.07%7.04%2.15%9.62%5.85%6.95%11.27%7.78%6.64%5.43%
SSFNX
State Street Target Retirement Fund
4.63%4.86%5.78%5.26%5.12%6.69%1.61%3.35%4.40%2.72%1.84%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, NWLSX and SSFNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NWLSX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to SSFNX (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWLSX dropped -52.58% vs SSFNX's -16.62%.

SSFNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWLSX and SSFNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer