PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWLSX vs. NDMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NWLSX vs. NDMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund (NWLSX) and Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund (NDMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWLSX achieves a 8.28% return, which is significantly lower than NDMAX's 10.65% return. Over the past 10 years, NWLSX has underperformed NDMAX with an annualized return of 8.44%, while NDMAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.11% annualized return.


NWLSX

1D
0.00%
1M
3.77%
YTD
8.28%
6M
9.06%
1Y
20.30%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
8.44%

NDMAX

1D
0.19%
1M
4.31%
YTD
10.65%
6M
11.68%
1Y
24.02%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
9.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWLSX vs. NDMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NWLSX
Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund
8.28%16.16%10.17%17.00%-17.70%13.33%12.81%18.63%-8.01%15.06%
NDMAX
Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund
10.65%15.92%12.14%18.16%-17.78%14.69%12.86%19.67%-8.68%15.70%

Correlation

The correlation between NWLSX and NDMAX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007

0.99

The correlation between NWLSX and NDMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWLSX vs. NDMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWLSX
NWLSX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
NWLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
NWLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

NDMAX
NDMAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
NDMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NDMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWLSX vs. NDMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund (NWLSX) and Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund (NDMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NWLSXNDMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

3.17

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.40

13.58

-0.18

NWLSX vs. NDMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWLSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the NDMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWLSX and NDMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NWLSXNDMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.39

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.59

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.63

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.39

-0.01

Drawdowns

NWLSX vs. NDMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWLSX drawdown since its inception was -52.58%, which is greater than NDMAX's maximum drawdown of -47.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWLSX and NDMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWLSXNDMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.58%

-47.85%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.88%

-7.75%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.73%

-13.33%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.54%

-27.51%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.59%

-33.00%

+2.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.57%

-8.18%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

1.80%

-0.26%

Volatility

NWLSX vs. NDMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund (NWLSX) is 2.78%, while Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund (NDMAX) has a volatility of 3.23%. This indicates that NWLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NDMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWLSXNDMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

3.23%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.13%

8.31%

-1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.79%

10.25%

-1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.95%

13.65%

-0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.71%

14.48%

-0.77%

NWLSX vs. NDMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWLSX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than NDMAX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

NWLSX vs. NDMAX - Dividend Comparison

NWLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.82%, less than NDMAX's 8.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NDMAX
Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderately Aggressive Fund
8.43%9.28%16.19%6.30%3.88%5.83%5.68%8.26%14.63%10.61%8.26%7.82%
NWLSX
Nationwide Destination 2035 Fund
7.82%8.36%14.07%7.04%2.15%9.62%5.85%6.95%11.27%7.78%6.64%5.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, NWLSX and NDMAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NDMAX has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to NWLSX (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWLSX dropped -52.58% vs NDMAX's -47.85%.

NDMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWLSX and NDMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer