PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWJVX vs. LCCMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NWJVX vs. LCCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Loomis Short Term Bond Fund (NWJVX) and Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWJVX achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than LCCMX's 3.89% return. Over the past 10 years, NWJVX has underperformed LCCMX with an annualized return of 2.66%, while LCCMX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.26% annualized return.


NWJVX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
0.96%
6M
1.32%
1Y
4.37%
3Y*
5.50%
5Y*
2.67%
10Y*
2.66%

LCCMX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.19%
YTD
3.89%
6M
6.59%
1Y
11.06%
3Y*
14.65%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
4.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWJVX vs. LCCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NWJVX
Nationwide Loomis Short Term Bond Fund
0.96%5.78%5.57%5.85%-4.01%-0.30%5.09%5.91%1.08%0.97%
LCCMX
Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund
3.89%9.73%18.51%13.73%-13.30%1.30%7.52%0.65%2.35%1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between NWJVX and LCCMX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2005

0.21

The correlation between NWJVX and LCCMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWJVX vs. LCCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWJVX
NWJVX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
NWJVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWJVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWJVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
NWJVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWJVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

LCCMX
LCCMX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
LCCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
LCCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWJVX vs. LCCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Loomis Short Term Bond Fund (NWJVX) and Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NWJVXLCCMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

2.01

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

2.96

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.19

10.42

+4.77

NWJVX vs. LCCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWJVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the LCCMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWJVX and LCCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NWJVXLCCMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.46

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.22

1.06

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.67

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.81

-0.63

Drawdowns

NWJVX vs. LCCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWJVX drawdown since its inception was -21.61%, smaller than the maximum LCCMX drawdown of -24.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWJVX and LCCMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWJVXLCCMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.61%

-24.57%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.19%

-3.76%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.19%

-3.76%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.00%

-19.20%

+12.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.61%

-24.57%

+2.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.67%

-2.80%

-1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.29%

1.06%

-0.77%

Volatility

NWJVX vs. LCCMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nationwide Loomis Short Term Bond Fund (NWJVX) is 0.52%, while Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX) has a volatility of 0.68%. This indicates that NWJVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWJVXLCCMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.52%

0.68%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.35%

4.06%

-2.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87%

4.53%

-2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.20%

5.84%

-3.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.29%

6.35%

+4.94%

NWJVX vs. LCCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWJVX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than LCCMX's 2.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

NWJVX vs. LCCMX - Dividend Comparison

NWJVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, less than LCCMX's 8.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCCMX
Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund
8.53%8.93%10.39%8.55%5.68%2.11%2.11%2.98%2.89%2.10%2.01%2.75%
NWJVX
Nationwide Loomis Short Term Bond Fund
4.19%4.39%4.58%3.59%1.76%1.36%2.00%2.50%2.19%1.48%1.35%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


NWJVX and LCCMX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCCMX has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to NWJVX (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWJVX dropped -21.61% vs LCCMX's -24.57%.

LCCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWJVX and LCCMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer