PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWHVX vs. NWISX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NWHVX vs. NWISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) and Nationwide Destination 2030 Fund (NWISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWHVX achieves a -3.46% return, which is significantly lower than NWISX's 6.24% return. Over the past 10 years, NWHVX has outperformed NWISX with an annualized return of 8.80%, while NWISX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.45% annualized return.


NWHVX

1D
-0.58%
1M
1.77%
YTD
-3.46%
6M
-4.96%
1Y
-8.76%
3Y*
5.85%
5Y*
1.47%
10Y*
8.80%

NWISX

1D
-0.56%
1M
1.95%
YTD
6.24%
6M
6.67%
1Y
16.36%
3Y*
12.67%
5Y*
5.57%
10Y*
7.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWHVX vs. NWISX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NWHVX
Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund
-3.46%-2.38%9.89%23.84%-28.32%25.03%31.17%29.96%-2.97%23.11%
NWISX
Nationwide Destination 2030 Fund
6.24%14.63%8.73%15.11%-16.85%11.16%12.13%17.47%-7.35%14.17%

Correlation

The correlation between NWHVX and NWISX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2013

0.86

The correlation between NWHVX and NWISX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWHVX vs. NWISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWHVX
NWHVX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NWHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NWHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

NWISX
NWISX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
NWISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWISX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
NWISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWISX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWHVX vs. NWISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) and Nationwide Destination 2030 Fund (NWISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NWHVXNWISXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.42

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.47

2.76

-3.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.06

12.54

-13.60

NWHVX vs. NWISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWHVX Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the NWISX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWHVX and NWISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NWHVXNWISXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

2.24

-2.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.49

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.63

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.39

+0.06

Drawdowns

NWHVX vs. NWISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWHVX drawdown since its inception was -37.12%, smaller than the maximum NWISX drawdown of -49.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWHVX and NWISX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWHVXNWISXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.12%

-49.97%

+12.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.82%

-6.12%

-11.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.80%

-8.79%

-11.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.12%

-28.31%

-8.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.12%

-28.31%

-8.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.61%

-0.56%

-12.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.83%

-7.93%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.95%

1.34%

+6.61%

Volatility

NWHVX vs. NWISX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Nationwide Destination 2030 Fund (NWISX) at 2.50%. This indicates that NWHVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWHVXNWISXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

2.50%

+1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.38%

6.16%

+5.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.46%

7.52%

+6.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.87%

11.41%

+8.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.68%

11.89%

+7.79%

NWHVX vs. NWISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWHVX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than NWISX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

NWHVX vs. NWISX - Dividend Comparison

NWHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.25%, more than NWISX's 7.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NWHVX
Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund
8.25%7.96%11.93%16.14%36.45%34.64%6.16%18.85%38.53%11.37%8.97%13.54%
NWISX
Nationwide Destination 2030 Fund
7.11%7.48%13.04%7.29%3.01%9.66%5.40%6.21%11.67%7.96%7.01%5.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


NWHVX and NWISX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NWHVX has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to NWISX (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWHVX dropped -37.12% vs NWISX's -49.97%.

NWISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWHVX and NWISX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer