NWHVX vs. NEEGX
NWHVX (Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund) and NEEGX (Needham Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NWHVX returned 8.75%/yr vs 14.38%/yr for NEEGX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NWHVX charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for NEEGX.
Performance
NWHVX vs. NEEGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NWHVX achieves a -2.52% return, which is significantly lower than NEEGX's 40.35% return. Over the past 10 years, NWHVX has underperformed NEEGX with an annualized return of 8.75%, while NEEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.38% annualized return.
NWHVX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- 6M
- -6.04%
- YTD
- -2.52%
- 1Y
- -6.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.00%
- 5Y*
- 0.51%
- 10Y*
- 8.75%
NEEGX
- 1D
- -2.93%
- 1M
- -10.08%
- 6M
- 21.74%
- YTD
- 40.35%
- 1Y
- 55.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.96%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 14.38%
NWHVX vs. NEEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund | -2.52% | -2.38% | 9.89% | 23.84% | -28.32% | 25.03% | 31.17% | 29.96% | -2.97% | 23.11% |
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund | 40.35% | 8.76% | 14.45% | 26.85% | -33.57% | 27.63% | 41.73% | 42.33% | -10.56% | 8.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between NWHVX and NEEGX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2013 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NWHVX and NEEGX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NWHVX vs. NEEGX — Risk / Return Rank
NWHVX
NEEGX
NWHVX vs. NEEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) and Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NWHVX | NEEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.31 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 3.83 | -4.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | 12.35 | -13.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NWHVX vs. NEEGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NWHVX drawdown since its inception was -37.12%, smaller than the maximum NEEGX drawdown of -53.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWHVX and NEEGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NWHVX | NEEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.12% | -53.60% | +16.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.82% | -15.11% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.80% | -38.66% | +18.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.12% | -43.35% | +6.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.12% | -43.35% | +6.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.77% | -15.11% | +3.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -10.87% | +3.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.64% | 4.67% | +3.97% |
Volatility
NWHVX vs. NEEGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) is 3.77%, while Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) has a volatility of 13.42%. This indicates that NWHVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NWHVX | NEEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 13.42% | -9.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.74% | 25.54% | -13.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.82% | 31.15% | -16.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 29.19% | -9.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.64% | 25.73% | -6.09% |
NWHVX vs. NEEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NWHVX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than NEEGX's 1.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
NWHVX vs. NEEGX - Dividend Comparison
NWHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.17%, more than NEEGX's 5.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund | 5.39% | 7.57% | 3.92% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 6.92% | 5.73% | 11.31% | 17.79% | 9.70% | 4.22% | 6.74% |
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund | 8.17% | 7.96% | 11.93% | 16.14% | 36.45% | 34.64% | 6.16% | 18.85% | 38.53% | 11.37% | 8.97% | 13.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NWHVX and NEEGX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEEGX has higher volatility (13.42%) compared to NWHVX (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWHVX dropped -37.12% vs NEEGX's -53.60%.
NEEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NWHVX and NEEGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer