NWHVX vs. MMGPX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX).

NWHVX is managed by Nationwide. It was launched on Jan 4, 1999. MMGPX is managed by Morgan Stanley. It was launched on Apr 30, 2017.

Performance

NWHVX vs. MMGPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NWHVX vs. MMGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund	-11.40%	-2.38%	9.89%	23.84%	-28.32%	25.03%	31.17%	29.96%	-2.97%	21.29%
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio	-14.93%	12.58%	41.83%	44.34%	-81.34%	-11.55%	152.67%	40.20%	10.89%	28.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWHVX achieves a -11.40% return, which is significantly higher than MMGPX's -14.93% return.

NWHVX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -10.82%
• YTD: -11.40%
• 6M: -15.58%
• 1Y: -11.65%
• 3Y*: 2.87%
• 5Y*: 0.64%
• 10Y*: 8.14%

MMGPX

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: -9.08%
• YTD: -14.93%
• 6M: -23.43%
• 1Y: 3.91%
• 3Y*: 19.10%
• 5Y*: -19.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWHVX vs. MMGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWHVX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than MMGPX's 0.04% expense ratio.

NWHVX

Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund

MMGPX

Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio

Return for Risk

NWHVX vs. MMGPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWHVX

NWHVX Risk / Return Rank: 1
NWHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NWHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NWHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NWHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NWHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

MMGPX

MMGPX Risk / Return Rank: 7
MMGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
MMGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
MMGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
MMGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
MMGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWHVX vs. MMGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NWHVX	MMGPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.62	0.10	-0.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.81	0.38	-1.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.05	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.72	-0.02	-0.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-2.09	-0.05	-2.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NWHVX vs. MMGPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWHVX Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the MMGPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWHVX and MMGPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NWHVX	MMGPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.62	0.10	-0.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03	-0.44	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.14	+0.27

Correlation

The correlation between NWHVX and MMGPX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

NWHVX vs. MMGPX - Dividend Comparison

NWHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.99%, more than MMGPX's 0.50% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund	8.99%	7.96%	11.93%	16.14%	36.45%	34.64%	6.16%	18.85%	38.53%	11.37%	8.97%	13.54%
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio	0.50%	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	64.53%	7.93%	15.63%	28.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

NWHVX vs. MMGPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWHVX drawdown since its inception was -37.12%, smaller than the maximum MMGPX drawdown of -87.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWHVX and MMGPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NWHVX	MMGPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.12%	-87.45%	+50.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.82%	-27.79%	+9.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.12%	-86.09%	+48.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.80%	-74.10%	+54.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.74%	-38.69%	+30.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.13%	11.11%	-4.98%

Volatility

NWHVX vs. MMGPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) is 4.60%, while Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) has a volatility of 7.90%. This indicates that NWHVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NWHVX	MMGPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.60%	7.90%	-3.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.91%	21.47%	-10.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.16%	31.90%	-13.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.85%	45.71%	-25.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.64%	39.03%	-19.39%