NWHVX vs. BQMGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NWHVX (Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund) and BQMGX (Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NWHVX returned 8.80%/yr vs 8.77%/yr for BQMGX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 1.07% expense ratio.

Performance

NWHVX vs. BQMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) and Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund (BQMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWHVX achieves a -3.46% return, which is significantly lower than BQMGX's -3.06% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NWHVX having a 8.80% annualized return and BQMGX not far behind at 8.77%.

NWHVX

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 1.77%
• YTD: -3.46%
• 6M: -4.96%
• 1Y: -8.76%
• 3Y*: 5.85%
• 5Y*: 1.47%
• 10Y*: 8.80%

BQMGX

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: -3.06%
• 6M: -4.04%
• 1Y: -2.98%
• 3Y*: 5.07%
• 5Y*: 2.93%
• 10Y*: 8.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWHVX vs. BQMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund	-3.46%	-2.38%	9.89%	23.84%	-28.32%	25.03%	31.17%	29.96%	-2.97%	23.11%
BQMGX Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund	-3.06%	-0.29%	14.16%	13.00%	-19.44%	23.02%	19.62%	32.05%	-6.68%	22.16%

Correlation

The correlation between NWHVX and BQMGX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2013	0.92

The correlation between NWHVX and BQMGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NWHVX vs. BQMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWHVX

NWHVX Risk / Return Rank: 1
NWHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NWHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NWHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NWHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NWHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

BQMGX

BQMGX Risk / Return Rank: 2
BQMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BQMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BQMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BQMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BQMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWHVX vs. BQMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) and Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund (BQMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NWHVX	BQMGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.58	-0.27	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.74	-0.30	-0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	0.97	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.47	-0.28	-0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.06	-0.66	-0.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NWHVX vs. BQMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWHVX Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the BQMGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWHVX and BQMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NWHVX	BQMGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.58	-0.27	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	0.17	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.49	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.50	-0.06

Drawdowns

NWHVX vs. BQMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWHVX drawdown since its inception was -37.12%, roughly equal to the maximum BQMGX drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWHVX and BQMGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NWHVX	BQMGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.12%	-36.05%	-1.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.82%	-11.62%	-6.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.80%	-18.72%	-1.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.12%	-25.92%	-11.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.12%	-36.05%	-1.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.61%	-8.96%	-3.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.83%	-5.87%	-1.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.95%	4.90%	+3.05%

Volatility

NWHVX vs. BQMGX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund (BQMGX) at 3.38%. This indicates that NWHVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BQMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NWHVX	BQMGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.97%	3.38%	+0.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.38%	9.13%	+2.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.46%	12.19%	+2.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.87%	16.83%	+3.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.68%	17.98%	+1.70%

NWHVX vs. BQMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NWHVX and BQMGX have an expense ratio of 1.07%.

Dividends

NWHVX vs. BQMGX - Dividend Comparison

NWHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.25%, more than BQMGX's 4.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BQMGX Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund	4.25%	4.12%	5.99%	0.00%	5.90%	8.05%	5.27%	3.50%	0.00%	0.08%	1.07%	5.80%
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund	8.25%	7.96%	11.93%	16.14%	36.45%	34.64%	6.16%	18.85%	38.53%	11.37%	8.97%	13.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NWHVX and BQMGX in my portfolio?

NWHVX and BQMGX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NWHVX or BQMGX?

NWHVX has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to BQMGX (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWHVX dropped -37.12% vs BQMGX's -36.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BQMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.27 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.