PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BQMGX vs. BMDSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BQMGX vs. BMDSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund (BQMGX) and Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund (BMDSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BQMGX achieves a -2.25% return, which is significantly lower than BMDSX's 6.09% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BQMGX having a 8.86% annualized return and BMDSX not far behind at 8.65%.


BQMGX

1D
0.74%
1M
0.48%
YTD
-2.25%
6M
-2.57%
1Y
-1.61%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
3.23%
10Y*
8.86%

BMDSX

1D
1.07%
1M
1.76%
YTD
6.09%
6M
5.22%
1Y
2.16%
3Y*
0.78%
5Y*
-0.81%
10Y*
8.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BQMGX vs. BMDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BQMGX
Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund
-2.25%-0.29%14.16%13.00%-19.44%23.02%19.62%32.05%-6.68%22.16%
BMDSX
Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund
6.09%-9.55%-1.16%19.91%-27.86%21.81%34.56%35.94%-1.52%26.61%

Correlation

The correlation between BQMGX and BMDSX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2010

0.92

The correlation between BQMGX and BMDSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BQMGX vs. BMDSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BQMGX
BQMGX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BQMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BQMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BQMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BQMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BQMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BMDSX
BMDSX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BMDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BMDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BQMGX vs. BMDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund (BQMGX) and Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund (BMDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BQMGXBMDSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.13

0.10

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.10

0.25

-0.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.03

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.13

0.11

-0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.31

0.24

-0.55

BQMGX vs. BMDSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BQMGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the BMDSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BQMGX and BMDSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BQMGXBMDSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

0.10

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

-0.04

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.42

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.34

+0.17

Drawdowns

BQMGX vs. BMDSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BQMGX drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, smaller than the maximum BMDSX drawdown of -53.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BQMGX and BMDSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BQMGXBMDSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.05%

-53.96%

+17.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-14.54%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.72%

-25.04%

+6.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.92%

-36.24%

+10.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.05%

-36.24%

+0.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.20%

-21.07%

+12.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.87%

-10.94%

+5.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.85%

6.75%

-1.90%

Volatility

BQMGX vs. BMDSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund (BQMGX) is 3.48%, while Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund (BMDSX) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that BQMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BQMGXBMDSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

3.91%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.18%

11.63%

-2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.20%

15.25%

-3.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.83%

21.03%

-4.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.99%

20.80%

-2.81%

BQMGX vs. BMDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BQMGX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BMDSX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

BQMGX vs. BMDSX - Dividend Comparison

BQMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, less than BMDSX's 13.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMDSX
Baird Mid Cap Growth Fund
13.08%13.88%4.57%2.44%1.79%17.82%10.09%5.77%6.62%4.87%0.00%0.15%
BQMGX
Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund
4.21%4.12%5.99%0.00%5.90%8.05%5.27%3.50%0.00%0.08%1.07%5.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


BQMGX and BMDSX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BMDSX has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to BQMGX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BQMGX dropped -36.05% vs BMDSX's -53.96%.

BMDSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BQMGX and BMDSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer