NWESX vs. FRQHX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

NWESX (Nationwide Destination Retirement Fund) and FRQHX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, NWESX returned 4.39%/yr vs 2.97%/yr for FRQHX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NWESX charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for FRQHX.

Performance

NWESX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Destination Retirement Fund (NWESX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWESX achieves a 5.12% return, which is significantly higher than FRQHX's 3.71% return.

NWESX

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 1.15%
• YTD: 5.12%
• 6M: 5.25%
• 1Y: 13.76%
• 3Y*: 9.61%
• 5Y*: 4.39%
• 10Y*: 5.52%

FRQHX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.66%
• YTD: 3.71%
• 6M: 3.85%
• 1Y: 9.62%
• 3Y*: 7.44%
• 5Y*: 2.97%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWESX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
NWESX Nationwide Destination Retirement Fund	5.12%	12.66%	6.15%	11.26%	-14.14%	6.52%	10.59%	1.89%
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	3.71%	10.01%	4.68%	8.75%	-12.22%	4.04%	9.80%	3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between NWESX and FRQHX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019	0.91

The correlation between NWESX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NWESX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWESX

NWESX Risk / Return Rank: 63
NWESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
NWESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
NWESX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
NWESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
NWESX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

FRQHX

FRQHX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FRQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FRQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FRQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FRQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FRQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWESX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Destination Retirement Fund (NWESX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NWESX	FRQHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	2.26	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	3.27	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.45	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.67	2.88	-0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.93	12.04	-0.12

NWESX vs. FRQHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWESX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the FRQHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWESX and FRQHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NWESX vs. FRQHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWESX drawdown since its inception was -39.22%, which is greater than FRQHX's maximum drawdown of -16.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWESX and FRQHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NWESX	FRQHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.22%	-16.90%	-22.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.12%	-3.41%	-1.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.44%	-5.15%	-1.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.05%	-16.90%	-8.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-0.41%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.17%	-3.77%	-2.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.14%	0.81%	+0.33%

Volatility

NWESX vs. FRQHX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Destination Retirement Fund (NWESX) has a higher volatility of 2.59% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) at 2.04%. This indicates that NWESX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NWESX	FRQHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.59%	2.04%	+0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.44%	3.70%	+1.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.41%	4.36%	+2.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.18%	5.60%	+3.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.16%	5.77%	+2.39%

NWESX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWESX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

NWESX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison

NWESX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than FRQHX's 3.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	3.40%	3.20%	3.20%	2.95%	5.25%	6.22%	3.70%	2.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NWESX Nationwide Destination Retirement Fund	3.35%	3.78%	10.53%	5.51%	4.69%	10.16%	4.26%	4.93%	7.59%	5.04%	6.11%	8.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NWESX and FRQHX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, NWESX and FRQHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NWESX or FRQHX?

NWESX has higher volatility (2.59%) compared to FRQHX (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWESX dropped -39.22% vs FRQHX's -16.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.