PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWCIX vs. AMFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NWCIX vs. AMFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide BNY Mellon Core Plus Bond ESG Fund (NWCIX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWCIX achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly higher than AMFIX's 0.30% return.


NWCIX

1D
0.33%
1M
0.84%
YTD
0.83%
6M
0.94%
1Y
5.20%
3Y*
4.86%
5Y*
0.32%
10Y*
2.19%

AMFIX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.30%
6M
0.40%
1Y
2.31%
3Y*
3.32%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWCIX vs. AMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NWCIX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Core Plus Bond ESG Fund
0.83%9.64%-0.35%6.92%-13.87%-0.44%8.64%9.77%-0.98%0.52%
AMFIX
AAMA Income Fund
0.30%3.74%3.48%3.84%-6.26%-1.37%2.24%2.47%0.89%-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between NWCIX and AMFIX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2017

0.77

The correlation between NWCIX and AMFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWCIX vs. AMFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWCIX
NWCIX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
NWCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
NWCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

AMFIX
AMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
AMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWCIX vs. AMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide BNY Mellon Core Plus Bond ESG Fund (NWCIX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NWCIXAMFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.44

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

3.20

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.70

9.90

-4.20

NWCIX vs. AMFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the AMFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWCIX and AMFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NWCIX vs. AMFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWCIX drawdown since its inception was -18.98%, which is greater than AMFIX's maximum drawdown of -9.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWCIX and AMFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWCIXAMFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.98%

-9.35%

-9.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-0.74%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.34%

-0.88%

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.98%

-8.91%

-10.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-0.39%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.38%

-2.02%

-1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

0.24%

+0.70%

Volatility

NWCIX vs. AMFIX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide BNY Mellon Core Plus Bond ESG Fund (NWCIX) has a higher volatility of 1.11% compared to AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX) at 0.46%. This indicates that NWCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWCIXAMFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

0.46%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.63%

0.91%

+1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54%

1.11%

+2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.98%

2.17%

+3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.85%

1.74%

+3.11%

NWCIX vs. AMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWCIX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFIX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

NWCIX vs. AMFIX - Dividend Comparison

NWCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, more than AMFIX's 2.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMFIX
AAMA Income Fund
2.21%2.08%2.44%1.70%0.83%0.57%0.83%1.24%1.24%0.40%0.00%0.00%
NWCIX
Nationwide BNY Mellon Core Plus Bond ESG Fund
5.17%3.20%4.29%3.57%2.39%2.98%4.49%3.11%3.45%3.16%3.47%3.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


NWCIX and AMFIX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NWCIX has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to AMFIX (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWCIX dropped -18.98% vs AMFIX's -9.35%.

AMFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWCIX and AMFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer