PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWAUX vs. GQEFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NWAUX vs. GQEFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX) and GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWAUX achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly lower than GQEFX's 7.42% return.


NWAUX

1D
0.91%
1M
1.19%
6M
2.96%
YTD
6.48%
1Y
7.04%
3Y*
11.36%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.72%

GQEFX

1D
0.82%
1M
0.72%
6M
4.91%
YTD
7.42%
1Y
22.67%
3Y*
16.19%
5Y*
12.73%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NWAUX vs. GQEFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NWAUX
Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund
6.48%-4.92%27.90%18.30%-3.23%22.65%
GQEFX
GMO Quality Fund Class IV
7.42%19.64%17.54%28.95%-15.30%27.78%

Correlation

The correlation between NWAUX and GQEFX is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021

0.63

The correlation between NWAUX and GQEFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWAUX vs. GQEFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NWAUX
NWAUX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
NWAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
NWAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

GQEFX
GQEFX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
GQEFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQEFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQEFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
GQEFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQEFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NWAUX vs. GQEFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX) and GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NWAUXGQEFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.29

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

1.67

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.77

6.61

-4.84

NWAUX vs. GQEFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWAUX Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the GQEFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWAUX and GQEFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NWAUX vs. GQEFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWAUX drawdown since its inception was -21.07%, smaller than the maximum GQEFX drawdown of -30.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWAUX and GQEFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWAUXGQEFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.07%

-30.42%

+9.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-12.74%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.31%

-15.55%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.07%

-24.22%

+3.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.76%

0.00%

-9.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.04%

-4.11%

-2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

3.22%

+0.56%

Volatility

NWAUX vs. GQEFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX) is 2.80%, while GMO Quality Fund Class IV (GQEFX) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that NWAUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GQEFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWAUXGQEFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

3.21%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.34%

10.18%

-1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.60%

12.82%

-2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

15.94%

+0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.83%

17.69%

-1.86%

NWAUX vs. GQEFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWAUX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than GQEFX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

NWAUX vs. GQEFX - Dividend Comparison

NWAUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, less than GQEFX's 11.16% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GQEFX
GMO Quality Fund Class IV
11.16%11.15%3.70%3.43%11.84%10.23%13.62%8.09%21.69%7.08%
NWAUX
Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund
4.89%4.35%13.58%0.40%1.93%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NWAUX and GQEFX have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GQEFX has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to NWAUX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWAUX dropped -21.07% vs GQEFX's -30.42%.

GQEFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWAUX and GQEFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer