NVYY vs. COIW
NVYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF) and COIW (COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVYY is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while COIW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVYY returned 31.22% vs -47.92% for COIW. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for COIW.
Performance
NVYY vs. COIW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVYY achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly higher than COIW's -34.53% return.
NVYY
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 4.60%
- 6M
- 3.99%
- 1Y
- 31.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COIW
- 1D
- -7.79%
- 1M
- -23.73%
- YTD
- -34.53%
- 6M
- -48.92%
- 1Y
- -47.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVYY vs. COIW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF | 4.60% | 31.62% |
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF | -34.53% | -20.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVYY and COIW is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVYY vs. COIW — Risk / Return Rank
NVYY
COIW
NVYY vs. COIW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY) and COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVYY | COIW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | -0.57 | +1.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | -0.52 | +2.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.94 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | -0.64 | +2.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.82 | -1.03 | +5.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVYY | COIW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | -0.57 | +1.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.48 | -0.46 | +1.94 |
Drawdowns
NVYY vs. COIW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVYY drawdown since its inception was -14.90%, smaller than the maximum COIW drawdown of -74.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVYY and COIW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVYY | COIW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.90% | -74.55% | +59.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.90% | -74.55% | +59.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.86% | -70.36% | +65.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.00% | -37.72% | +32.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.50% | 46.70% | -40.20% |
Volatility
NVYY vs. COIW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY) is 4.65%, while COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) has a volatility of 22.46%. This indicates that NVYY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COIW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVYY | COIW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 22.46% | -17.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.78% | 61.94% | -45.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.28% | 84.90% | -60.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.10% | 91.07% | -66.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.10% | 91.07% | -66.97% |
NVYY vs. COIW - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than COIW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVYY vs. COIW - Dividend Comparison
NVYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 147.62%, less than COIW's 226.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF | 226.68% | 120.37% |
NVYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF | 147.62% | 75.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVYY and COIW have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COIW has higher volatility (22.46%) compared to NVYY (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVYY dropped -14.90% vs COIW's -74.55%.
On 1-year performance, NVYY leads with 31.22% vs -47.92% for COIW. On fees, COIW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, NVYY has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVYY has performed better with a 31.22% return vs -47.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COIW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for NVYY.
COIW has the higher dividend yield at 226.68%, compared with 147.62% for NVYY.
NVYY is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while COIW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for NVYY and 0.99% for COIW.
NVYY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVYY and COIW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer