PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVYY vs. COIW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVYY vs. COIW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY) and COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVYY achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly higher than COIW's -34.53% return.


NVYY

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.98%
YTD
4.60%
6M
3.99%
1Y
31.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COIW

1D
-7.79%
1M
-23.73%
YTD
-34.53%
6M
-48.92%
1Y
-47.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVYY vs. COIW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NVYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF
4.60%31.62%
COIW
COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF
-34.53%-20.35%

Correlation

The correlation between NVYY and COIW is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVYY vs. COIW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVYY
NVYY Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
NVYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVYY Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
NVYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVYY Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

COIW
COIW Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
COIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
COIW Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
COIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
COIW Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVYY vs. COIW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY) and COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVYYCOIWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.29

-0.57

+1.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.71

-0.52

+2.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.94

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

-0.64

+2.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.82

-1.03

+5.84

NVYY vs. COIW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVYY Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the COIW Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVYY and COIW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVYYCOIWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

-0.57

+1.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.48

-0.46

+1.94

Drawdowns

NVYY vs. COIW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVYY drawdown since its inception was -14.90%, smaller than the maximum COIW drawdown of -74.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVYY and COIW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVYYCOIWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.90%

-74.55%

+59.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.90%

-74.55%

+59.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.86%

-70.36%

+65.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-37.72%

+32.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.50%

46.70%

-40.20%

Volatility

NVYY vs. COIW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY) is 4.65%, while COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) has a volatility of 22.46%. This indicates that NVYY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COIW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVYYCOIWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

22.46%

-17.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.78%

61.94%

-45.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.28%

84.90%

-60.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.10%

91.07%

-66.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.10%

91.07%

-66.97%

NVYY vs. COIW - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than COIW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVYY vs. COIW - Dividend Comparison

NVYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 147.62%, less than COIW's 226.68% yield.


PositionTTM2025
COIW
COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF
226.68%120.37%
NVYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF
147.62%75.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVYY and COIW have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COIW has higher volatility (22.46%) compared to NVYY (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVYY dropped -14.90% vs COIW's -74.55%.

On 1-year performance, NVYY leads with 31.22% vs -47.92% for COIW. On fees, COIW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, NVYY has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVYY has performed better with a 31.22% return vs -47.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COIW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for NVYY.

COIW has the higher dividend yield at 226.68%, compared with 147.62% for NVYY.

NVYY is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while COIW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for NVYY and 0.99% for COIW.

NVYY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVYY and COIW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer