PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVT vs. MPWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVT vs. MPWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in nVent Electric plc (NVT) and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVT achieves a 51.57% return, which is significantly lower than MPWR's 57.89% return.


NVT

1D
6.24%
1M
-3.72%
6M
37.41%
YTD
51.57%
1Y
97.47%
3Y*
42.62%
5Y*
39.10%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
29.74%

MPWR

1D
8.35%
1M
7.08%
6M
27.30%
YTD
57.89%
1Y
101.90%
3Y*
38.39%
5Y*
26.91%
10Y*
36.06%
ALL TIME*
27.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.37B$1.27B$1.35B
$373.02M$340.45M$350.68M

NVT vs. MPWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NVT
nVent Electric plc
51.57%51.27%16.63%55.98%3.32%67.15%-5.68%17.24%7.52%
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
57.89%54.45%-5.55%79.78%-27.78%35.49%107.49%54.80%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between NVT and MPWR is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2018

0.49

The correlation between NVT and MPWR shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NVT:

$24.88B

MPWR:

$70.06B

EPS

NVT:

$3.63

MPWR:

$16.33

PE Ratio

NVT:

42.34

MPWR:

87.33

PEG Ratio

NVT:

1.02

MPWR:

1.10

PS Ratio

NVT:

5.23

MPWR:

21.32

PB Ratio

NVT:

6.33

MPWR:

18.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVT:

$4.83B

MPWR:

$3.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVT:

$1.79B

MPWR:

$1.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

NVT:

$1.01B

MPWR:

$1.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVT vs. MPWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NVT
NVT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
NVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVT Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
NVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

MPWR
MPWR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
MPWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPWR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MPWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPWR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NVT vs. MPWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for nVent Electric plc (NVT) and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVTMPWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.30

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

3.94

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.66

9.44

+4.21

NVT vs. MPWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVT Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the MPWR Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVT and MPWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVT vs. MPWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVT drawdown since its inception was -56.18%, smaller than the maximum MPWR drawdown of -72.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVT and MPWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVTMPWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.18%

-72.27%

+16.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.42%

-25.99%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.67%

-51.65%

+4.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.67%

-51.65%

+4.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.44%

-15.49%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.83%

-17.71%

+5.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.16%

10.83%

-3.67%

Volatility

NVT vs. MPWR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for nVent Electric plc (NVT) is 16.96%, while Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) has a volatility of 18.57%. This indicates that NVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MPWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVTMPWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.96%

18.57%

-1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.03%

44.07%

-8.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.95%

54.05%

-8.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.09%

54.63%

-17.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.93%

47.86%

-8.93%

Dividends

NVT vs. MPWR - Dividend Comparison

NVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, more than MPWR's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
0.50%0.69%0.85%0.63%0.85%0.49%0.55%0.90%1.03%0.71%0.98%1.26%
NVT
nVent Electric plc
0.54%0.78%1.12%1.18%1.82%1.84%3.01%2.74%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NVT vs. MPWR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between nVent Electric plc and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

NVT vs. MPWR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between nVent Electric plc and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

NVT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a gross profit of 558.00M and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.9%.

MPWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 541.07M and revenue of 980.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.

NVT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, nVent Electric plc reported an operating income of 300.70M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.

MPWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 303.89M and revenue of 980.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.

NVT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a net income of 215.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.

MPWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 257.30M and revenue of 980.64M, resulting in a net margin of 26.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVT and MPWR have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MPWR has higher volatility (18.57%) compared to NVT (16.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVT dropped -56.18% vs MPWR's -72.27%.

NVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVT and MPWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer