PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVS vs. AMGN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVS vs. AMGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Novartis AG (NVS) and Amgen Inc. (AMGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVS achieves a 9.43% return, which is significantly higher than AMGN's 7.16% return. Over the past 10 years, NVS has underperformed AMGN with an annualized return of 10.33%, while AMGN has yielded a comparatively higher 11.65% annualized return.


NVS

1D
-1.84%
1M
0.27%
YTD
9.43%
6M
15.91%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
13.87%
10Y*
10.33%

AMGN

1D
-1.10%
1M
5.02%
YTD
7.16%
6M
9.19%
1Y
22.66%
3Y*
20.11%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
11.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVS vs. AMGN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVS
Novartis AG
9.43%46.95%0.02%16.14%8.06%-3.65%3.34%13.92%5.95%19.42%
AMGN
Amgen Inc.
7.16%29.67%-6.77%13.46%20.43%0.87%-1.99%27.60%15.23%22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between NVS and AMGN is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 1996

0.34

Over the past year, NVS and AMGN have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.34, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NVS:

$280.54B

AMGN:

$188.08B

EPS

NVS:

$6.99

AMGN:

$14.38

PE Ratio

NVS:

20.95

AMGN:

24.05

PEG Ratio

NVS:

1.42

AMGN:

1.38

PS Ratio

NVS:

5.06

AMGN:

5.04

PB Ratio

NVS:

7.28

AMGN:

20.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVS:

$56.05B

AMGN:

$37.24B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVS:

$42.19B

AMGN:

$26.61B

EBITDA (TTM)

NVS:

$22.40B

AMGN:

$17.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVS vs. AMGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVS
NVS Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

AMGN
AMGN Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
AMGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMGN Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AMGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMGN Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVS vs. AMGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novartis AG (NVS) and Amgen Inc. (AMGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVSAMGNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.17

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

1.37

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.43

3.21

+2.23

NVS vs. AMGN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVS Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the AMGN Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVS and AMGN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVSAMGNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

0.83

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.47

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.47

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.61

-0.19

Drawdowns

NVS vs. AMGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVS drawdown since its inception was -42.10%, smaller than the maximum AMGN drawdown of -63.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVS and AMGN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVSAMGNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.10%

-63.48%

+21.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.65%

-16.57%

+3.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.95%

-22.74%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.42%

-24.86%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.03%

-24.86%

-1.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.52%

-10.26%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.93%

-16.78%

+5.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.14%

7.09%

-1.95%

Volatility

NVS vs. AMGN - Volatility Comparison

Novartis AG (NVS) and Amgen Inc. (AMGN) have volatilities of 6.16% and 6.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVSAMGNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.16%

6.37%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.45%

19.14%

-4.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.63%

27.38%

-6.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.85%

23.89%

-5.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.62%

24.82%

-5.20%

Dividends

NVS vs. AMGN - Dividend Comparison

NVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than AMGN's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMGN
Amgen Inc.
2.83%2.91%3.45%2.96%2.95%3.13%2.78%2.41%2.71%2.65%2.74%1.95%
NVS
Novartis AG
3.26%2.90%3.84%3.44%3.70%3.86%3.22%3.03%3.47%3.24%3.73%3.10%

Financials

NVS vs. AMGN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Novartis AG and Amgen Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20222023202420252026
13.52B
8.62B
(NVS) Total Revenue
(AMGN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NVS vs. AMGN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Novartis AG and Amgen Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
74.4%
68.2%
Portfolio components
NVS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novartis AG reported a gross profit of 10.07B and revenue of 13.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

AMGN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amgen Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.87B and revenue of 8.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.

NVS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novartis AG reported an operating income of 4.24B and revenue of 13.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.3%.

AMGN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amgen Inc. reported an operating income of 2.67B and revenue of 8.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.9%.

NVS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novartis AG reported a net income of 3.16B and revenue of 13.52B, resulting in a net margin of 23.3%.

AMGN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amgen Inc. reported a net income of 1.82B and revenue of 8.62B, resulting in a net margin of 21.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVS and AMGN have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMGN has higher volatility (6.37%) compared to NVS (6.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVS dropped -42.10% vs AMGN's -63.48%.

NVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVS and AMGN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer